Kentucky voters rejected a ballot measure that would have changed language in the state's constitution to permanently deny the right to an abortion.

Reproductive-health advocates say the election results could pave the way for striking down the state's trigger law, which banned the procedure in the state immediately after the overturning of Roe v. Wade earlier this year.

Kentucky State Director for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates Tamarra Wieder explained that the state's Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on November 15 in a case that considers if the ban violates the privacy, bodily autonomy and self-determination rights guaranteed by the Kentucky Constitution.

"And it's no coincidence that we're in the courts next week," said Wieder. "The Supreme Court said they wanted to see what Kentuckians wanted from this vote."

Kentucky's official voter turnout report will be available on the State Board of Elections website in the coming days, but Secretary of State Michael Adam has said more than 50% of registered voters cast their ballot on Tuesday - possibly the highest voter turnout in a midterm election in decades.

On Twitter, Adams thanked candidates of both parties who lost "and graciously conceded rather than falsely alleging voter suppression or election fraud."

Wieder said reaction from residents on the "No" vote on Amendment 2 has been strong.

"When I'm out in the community, all I hear is that people want more access to health care, not less," said Wieder. "And this win transcended political ideology, religious identity, and really shows that Kentuckians come together to support people seeking health care, and they believe abortion is health care."

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said in a statement released Wednesday his office has filed a motion with the Kentucky Supreme Court arguing that voters' decision should have, quote, "no bearing on whether the court should consider creating a Kentucky version of Roe versus Wade."

Reproductive rights advocates are cheering Minnesota's new law centering around abortion access. Supporters predict it could help in other ways for rural patients.

Yesterday, Gov. Tim Walz signed the Protect Reproductive Options Act, making Minnesota the first state this year to firmly enshrine abortion rights since last summer's U.S. Supreme Court decision, which overturned federal protections.

The state already had legal safeguards from a mid-1990s state Supreme Court ruling.

Becky Twamley, board president of the Reproductive Health Alliance, said women in rural regions still have trouble getting reproductive care, even when meeting with local health providers.

"Women may go to a physician, and they won't even prescribe contraception, much less talk about what their other options are," Twamley pointed out.

She acknowledged some instances are still likely to occur, but added the new law might also quell some of the misinformation floating around reproductive care. The law states Minnesota residents have a fundamental right to options. Republican lawmakers, who are in the minority this session, have argued the law is too extreme.

Anti-abortion groups often cite personal religious beliefs in wanting to implement restrictions. But Twamley suggested the issue has become so divisive, it is often reduced to talking points that do not address the complexities of reproductive care.

"There's a lot of hyperbole around it," Twamley asserted. "I think we need to counter that with facts."

The group Power to Decide said nearly 300,000 women who are at or below the poverty level in Minnesota live in so-called "contraceptive deserts."

Backers of Minnesota's new protections say they are also vital since many other Midwestern states either now have abortion bans in place or are poised to enact them.

The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office has announced the launch of a new hotline for abortion-care providers and people seeking confidential legal advice.

The Abortion Legal Hotline will offer help accessing abortion-care resources for both residents and people traveling to the Commonwealth for abortion services.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Ma., reminded people there is no shame in having an abortion or seeking information regarding one's own health care.

"The only shame is that there are unrelenting, coordinated legislative efforts and forces at work to deny you that which is your fundamental human right, and that is access to health care," Pressley asserted.

The hotline will be run by Reproductive Equity Now, the Women's Bar Foundation and five law firms offering pro bono services, and can be reached at 1-833-309-6301.

Andrea Campbell, Attorney General, joined Pressley in announcing the new hotline and the Commonwealth's commitment to protecting abortion rights, and both drew attention to the collective grief surrounding Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man killed by police in Memphis earlier this month.

Campbell noted reproductive justice is about more than access to abortion.

"But it is about the right to parent a child in a safe and healthy community, and police violence interferes with that right," Campbell contended.

Following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade last year, more than a dozen states moved to ban or restrict access to legal abortion care.

In Massachusetts, lawmakers passed one of the strongest shield laws protecting abortion providers, as well as access to care for both residents and those who cross state lines to access health care services.

New York pharmacists would be able to dispense abortion medication under newly proposed legislation, and a person could get the prescription from a physician online or by mail.

This comes after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued new guidance allowing retail pharmacies to sell abortion pills.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, medication abortions made up 54% of all abortions in the country in 2020.

State Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, the bill's author, said it hasn't been filed yet, but if it passes, it should help people who don't want to visit an abortion clinic.

"If you can walk into a pharmacy and get this medication over the counter, you're much more likely to do it," she said. "Not everybody's going to go to a provider; not everyone feels comfortable. And providers are doing this with telehealth, so it doesn't require an exam."

The bill is part of a larger push by New York elected officials to expand abortion services in the state. In anticipation of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that ended federal abortion rights last June, Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a far-reaching package of legislation to improve access, as well as $35 million allocated to support abortion providers in New York State's 2022 budget.

While the bill is still in its earliest stages, Paulin said she's ready to meet whatever challenges come when it is filed. Abortion opponents in New York have encouraged such alternatives as better family services and making adoption easier.

Paulin said she knows the work won't end with this bill, adding that she is eager to work on whatever comes next.

"I'm working closely with advocate groups, like Planned Parenthood and ACOG, so if barriers come up, we will immediately address them," she said. "I think right now, we're just exploring some of those barriers and we will be putting legislation in shortly to alleviate them."

Other upcoming legislation would have all SUNY and CUNY colleges and universities offer abortion care, new protections of personal data for anyone seeking an abortion, and increased doctor reimbursement rates for reproductive health-care services.