Five of Six Nebraska Municipalities Vote in Favor of Banning Abortion
Thursday, November 10, 2022
Voters in five Nebraska towns approved local ordinances banning abortion care in this week's midterm elections, but reproductive health care advocates said more significant threats are likely to come in the new legislative session.
Scout Richters, senior legal and policy counsel for the ACLU of Nebraska, said measures that conflict with state law are not enforceable, and abortion remains legal at the state level, but she worries they will create a chilling effect.
"They harm Nebraskans by stigmatizing abortion care," Richters contended. "Really sowing a spirit of fear and confusion among those Nebraskans that live in these places."
Ordinances banning abortion within city limits were passed in Arnold, Brady, Hershey, Paxton and Wallace. A similar ordinance failed in Curtis. Blue Hill, Hayes Center -- which counts itself a member of the group "Sanctuary Cities for the Unborn" -- and Stapleton passed bans before the election.
Proponents argued towns have the power to regulate health and welfare, and believe the ordinances are necessary to protect the culture of communities and to send a message to state lawmakers.
Abortion-rights advocates are concerned about razor-thin margins when senators convene in January. Legislative Bill 933, a trigger-bill banning abortion after Roe v. Wade was overturned, was blocked in the last session through a filibuster, which requires 17 senators.
Richters stressed, while Nebraskans may have different views on abortion, it remains a deeply personal health care decision.
"So regardless of how any one individual feels about abortion, when someone makes that personal decision, they need to be able to access care without government interference," Richters asserted. "That decision needs to be between a patient and her doctor."
A poll conducted in March found 55% of Nebraskans oppose banning abortions, compared with 40% who support a ban.
Richters noted Nebraska's laws already impose significant barriers to abortion care, which disproportionately impact people of color, young people, low-wage workers and people living in rural areas.
"Forcing someone to carry a pregnancy against their will can have devastating and lasting consequences," Richters emphasized. "The bottom line is that a patient's health should drive medical decisions, not a politician's beliefs."
get more stories like this via email
Groups fighting for Palestinian rights are praising a new fact sheet on religious discrimination from the U.S. Department of Education's Office for …
Lawmakers and immigrants-rights activists in the Commonwealth are hoping to pass the Language Access and Inclusion Act, which would dramatically …
New U.S. Department of Agriculture rules will target fraud and increase oversight of the $64 billion-a-year organic food industry. In Iowa, the …
By Jennifer Weiss-Wolf for Ms. Magazine.Broadcast version by Eric Galatas for Colorado News Connection reporting for the Ms. Magazine-Public News …
Health and Wellness
With Black History Month underway, Wisconsin researchers and support groups are highlighting the disparities in cases of Alzheimer's disease…
North Dakota's plan to boost animal agriculture has reignited a thorny issue: loosening restrictions on corporate ownership of farms. The state said …
Oregon is pursuing an aggressive climate plan to switch to renewable energy sources, but it faces one often overlooked issue: enough high-voltage …
A measure in the Washington State Legislature would provide free school meals to K-12 students, but nutrition service workers are worried they are …