Congress has approved a $25 million funding boost for the National Labor Relations Board, and labor experts hope it will allow the agency to better handle a swath of petitions from people who want to unionize their workplaces.

According to the board, more than 2,500 union petitions have been filed between September 2021 and October 2022, the most the agency has seen since 2016. But since 2014, the board has also seen a 25% decline in funding.

Erin Mahoney, organizing coordinator for the Communications Workers of America-District 1, described what a better-funded board would be capable of.

"A well-funded National Labor Relations Board would mean that we would go back to having on-time elections, and not waiting weeks for those to be determined, sometimes months," Mahoney pointed out. "We'd be able to see decisions made more quickly when employers put forward like frivolous appeals and things like that."

Though the agency received $25 million, several members of Congress signed a letter saying the agency should receive $368 million of additional support. Mahoney noted if a hike had not been approved, it would have further delayed ongoing union organizing efforts across the country.

The agency was preparing for dire consequences if the funding didn't come through. In November, the board's Chairwoman and General Counsel sent a letter to members of a U.S. House subcommittee, urging them to approve a budget increase.

Sara Steffens, secretary-treasurer of the Communications Workers of America-District 1, explained what a lack of funding would have meant for worker's rights.

"Really there is only one place, the National Labor Relations Board, that protects workers in these situations," Steffens emphasized. "So, if they are underfunded, it's like tying the government's hand behind its back when it comes to enforcing labor laws."

The board had already implemented a hiring freeze to weather the effects from low funding. The letter added the board expects to use the additional budget amount for a pay increase in January, and to cover non-labor-related inflation costs.

By Nina B. Elkadi for Sentient.
Broadcast version by Judith Ruiz-Branch for Illinois News Connection reporting for the Sentient-Public News Service Collaboration

Eighty-one percent of evaluated poultry workers were found to be at high risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders, a new study from the U.S. Department of Agriculture says. This risk is primarily driven by high piece rates, which is the number of animals or pieces of meat handled by each slaughterhouse worker. Nearly half of pork processing workers evaluated were also at high risk for injury. 

On January 10, the department released the results of two studies, one on poultry workers and one on processed pork workers, that looked at the impact of line speed and workloads on worker health. The studies showed that piece rate was an important metric in determining workplace safety. While line speed is important, the number of people working on each line combined with line speed provides a more comprehensive risk analysis. Among surveyed poultry workers, 40 percent reported moderate to severe pain in the last year. Most did not report that pain to supervisors.

“These USDA studies reaffirm what we have long known – that poultry and swine slaughter poses serious risk to workers, regardless of line speed. We must take stronger action to protect these workers and ensure the safety of our food supply chain,” United Food and Commercial Workers International Union president Marc Perrone wrote in a press release. 

According to United Nations FAO estimates, each day 206 million chickens and 4 million pigs are killed for food. The vast majority are raised on factory farms and killed and processed in meatpacking plants, where risks to workers such as amputation and severe falls are common.

The studies’ authors recommend lowering piece rates by increasing staffing, adapting workstations for better ergonomic practices and improving medical management within workplaces. According to data from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, poultry and meat companies remain among the most dangerous to work for, in large-part due to injuries from keeping up with fast line speeds.

“Since the first term of Trump’s administration the problem of increasing the line speed and the decrease of the workforce have become some of the most important issues workers have been struggling with every day,” Magaly Licolli, executive director of Venceremos, an Arkansas-based poultry-worker advocacy group, wrote to Sentient.

“The findings of the reports are alarming, but not surprising to us because we’ve seen how for the past years, the industry has been putting workers’ health and safety at risk for the sake of their own profits,” wrote Licolli, who also called on the USDA and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to pass standards to prevent increasing line speed. 

During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration used federal legislation to declare meatpacking facilities essential, forcing workers to spend hours inside of buildings that would become hotspots for the virus. The Trump administration also granted poultry plants the ability to increase line speed, which some groups, like the Food Integrity Campaign, have been working to reverse through litigation. The studies released last week were a result of these lawsuits and pushback. During the height of the pandemic, as many as 269 meatpacking employees died and 59,000 workers tested positive for the virus.

“Industrial animal agriculture operates on a model of systemic exploitation to increase their profit margins at the expense of the well-being of animals, workers and rural communities. Today’s USDA studies on swine and poultry processing workers clearly show the human cost: life-altering injuries, painful work conditions and high risks tied to relentless production speeds and piece-rate pay structures,” Jessica Culpepper, executive director of FarmSTAND, a legal advocacy group, wrote to Sentient. “The incoming administration’s history of deregulating Big Ag and advancing policies that strip protections from vulnerable workers will only deepen these injustices.”


Nina B. Elkadi wrote this article for Sentient.


get more stories like this via email

Iowa is making $14 million available to take on the critical lack of child care in the state.

Many families said both parents want to work and would, if not for a critical lack of child care services. The funds will be used to build more than 870 new child care centers and expand existing ones in Iowa.

Jillian Herink, executive director of the Iowa Association for the Education of Young Children, said while more buildings will help, the bigger problem is a critical shortage of qualified child care providers.

"A lot of that stems from the low pay for child care providers," Herink pointed out. "And many of the places have a lack of ability to offer benefits, as well."

The funds were awarded to 13 employers who said they will build or expand child care facilities, giving more parents the chance to go to work.

Iowa also recently launched the Childcare Solutions Fund program, which provides communities with money to raise wages and offer health benefits to child care providers.

Herink noted it is one of many compensation strategies the state is using to address a yawning wage gap between traditional classroom educators and child care providers.

"For an example, a child care provider with a bachelor's degree, on average, makes of $16 an hour, where a kindergarten teacher with the same degree is making $30 an hour," Herink outlined. "The discrepancy is very large in the state of Iowa."

In an effort to help working parents find child care quickly, Iowa also recently launched a website, called Iowa Child Care Connect, which allows people to see when and where child care is available in real time.

The United Auto Workers union is negotiating its first union contract with Volkswagen at its Chattanooga plant, covering more than 4,000 members.

The union said its key demands include higher wages, affordable health benefits and retirement protections.

Steve Cochran, co chair of the bargaining committee, said the workers should have the same pay structure as the other automotive groups recognized in contracts with the United Auto Workers.

"Right now, at the end of the Big Three's contract, compared to what we have now is 24% higher," Cochran pointed out. "We're asking for right at about a 24% pay raise over the length of our contract, just to get us equal with the Big Three."

Cochran noted Volkswagen has offered a 16.5% raise over four years, leaving them several percentage points behind the current rates of the Big Three automakers. He added the cost-of-living raises are capped, unlike theirs. The Big Three -- Ford, General Motors and Chrysler -- were the first Southern autoworkers to unionize.

Cochran noted affordable health insurance is a key demand. His family plan costs around $400 a month, totaling $11,000 a year with deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses, an amount he said is unaffordable for many workers. He added some UAW autoworkers have secured fully paid family coverage with low co-pays.

"Some of us have to make a decision based on, 'Am I going to pay for this doctor visit and get this treatment, or am I going to pay my mortgage?'" Cochran observed. "We've had several members take 401(k) loans out, for example, or they may even remortgage your house. We've had several had to file bankruptcy."

Cochran emphasized the company recently eliminated its attendance bonus, which offered 8% of quarterly wages for perfect attendance. However, the strict policy meant even missing a single minute would forfeit the entire bonus.


get more stories like this via email