A recent move by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission could mean solar panel owners in the state could receive less money from Idaho Power.
The commission accepted the utility's Value of Distributed Energy Resources study, which concluded compensation rates for solar panel owners should be lower.
The utility would reduce the current compensation rate of eight to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour, to only 2.8 to four cents.
An independent study showed the same power is worth nearly five times more, and noted the report had errors, like outdated energy prices.
Lisa Young, director of the Idaho Chapter of the Sierra Club, said she believes it is a way for the utility to continue to advance toward their clean energy goals, but do so on their own terms.
"Once these solar compensation rates are going to be reduced, it is going to be a lot harder for folks to go solar," Young explained. "To afford putting solar on their roof, on their farm, on their business. And it is going to just disincentivize those investments."
With the study approved, Young explained Idaho Power will now present more concrete changes to the commission next year, focusing on Idaho Power's solar net metering program, which will likely include other structural changes to measuring power and billing. She added it will also be another chance for public input.
Young emphasized despite receiving significant public comment and hearing six hours of public testimony in opposition to the study in late October and early November, the commission approved it anyway, without requiring any additional changes from the utility. She argued the lack of consideration is disappointing.
Youth from the Idaho Climate Justice League, some of whom testified, wrote an open letter to the commissioners voicing their frustration.
"Young people are really upset," Young stressed. "They have done so much to try to raise awareness, raise the alarm. Really plead with those in power, the public utilities commissioners, to make the right decision. "
According to the Sierra Club, if the rates from Idaho Power's study are implemented, their rooftop solar compensation rates could be among the lowest of any utility in the country which they believe will impact solar jobs and local businesses in Idaho.
Disclosure: The Sierra Club contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment, and Environmental Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Indiana now classifies natural gas and propane as clean energy under a new state law.
Gov. Mike Braun signed Senate Bill 178, granting the fuels eligibility for tax credits and other incentives.
Sam Carpenter, executive director of the nonprofit Hoosier Environmental Council, opposed the measure, arguing the fuels significantly contribute to climate pollution.
"Methane is around 38 times more potent as a greenhouse gas," Carpenter pointed out. "What happens is there's a lot of leakage that happens in the drilling, in the extraction, the storage, the transportation, even the burning of methane."
Proponents of the bill argued it supports an "all of the above" approach to reduce energy costs for Hoosiers.
Carpenter cautioned investing in natural gas infrastructure could backfire. He noted the high costs and slow pace of building pipelines and transmission systems. He also emphasized Indiana's energy landscape is already shifting.
"Ninety percent of new generation coming online is renewable," Carpenter stressed. "It's wind, and it's solar, and it's battery storage, and that's really based on price, and it's based on the competitive factor, and it's based on timeliness."
Carpenter suggested the measure will likely have minimal immediate impact unless federal policies change. The bill passed with bipartisan support in the General Assembly.
get more stories like this via email
Lawmakers in the U.S. House will vote on a bill this week affecting Virginia's ability to create stronger emissions standards for vehicles and trucks.
The bill targets "California emissions standards," policies which call for 100% of cars sold to be electric or emissions-free by 2035. That policy has been partially or fully adopted by Virginia and 16 other states.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office to repeal the standards, leading to the legislative effort.
Rob Sargent, program director of Coltura, an energy transition nonprofit, said the federal government should be increasing access to electric vehicles instead of going against policies that promote them.
"EV tax credits and any programs designed to make EVs available to the American people are key," he said, "and can unlock decades of savings for people for what has been a strain on their household finances."
A report by the independent Government Accountability Office stated that Congress does not have the authority to repeal the emissions standards. Supporters of the bill have said banning gas cars is an affront to consumer freedom.
More than a half million Virginians are considered "gas super users," meaning they use significantly more gasoline than the average driver.
Sargent said repealing strong emissions standards would make it harder for states to reduce their carbon footprint.
"If Congress acts to pull the rug out from under those states' ability to take action to make cars cleaner in their state," he said, "then it also will undercut the availability of electric vehicles for consumers that would save them money."
The Senate is considering a similar bill despite opposition from within the Legislature.
get more stories like this via email
This week, the Trump administration announced what it terms "emergency permitting" for energy projects, streamlining a sometimes yearslong process down to 28 days. Opponents said it will mean time in court.
The U.S. Interior Department plans to alter the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act and National Historic Preservation Act so projects around oil, gas, coal, minerals and more can proceed without the agency approvals the laws require. The department said it's part of President Donald Trump's January "National Energy Emergency" declaration.
Erik Molvar, executive director of the Western Watersheds Project, said there is no such emergency.
"The idea that there's some kind of 'national energy emergency' is a lie that the Trump administration is making up to justify an extralegal approach to approving energy projects and skipping past the environmental safeguards that Congress put in place," Molvar contended.
He argued the move risks historic sites, wildlife habitat and recreation opportunities on Montana's 30 million acres of public land. Molvar added he expects energy projects brought under the new, streamlined permitting will be overturned in court.
The announcement comes just one day after the Interior Department's draft strategic plan for the next four years was leaked. A "big idea" cited in the draft is to, quote, "release federal holdings to allow state and local communities to reduce costs," and in parentheses, "housing." Molvar stressed it would essentially put federal responsibilities in the hands of smaller entities.
"These state and local governments have a distinct tendency -- particularly in conservative parts of the rural West -- to want to maximize industrial development, maximize local communities' abilities to line their own pockets, with really little consideration to the long-term health of the land," Molvar emphasized.
Strategic goals listed in the plan include to "restore American prosperity" and "ensure national security through infrastructure and innovation."
get more stories like this via email