In November, Colorado voters approved the largest source of dedicated funding to address affordable housing and homelessness in the state's history. Lawmakers will debate priorities for almost $300 million generated through Proposition 123 in the upcoming legislative session.

Cathy Alderman, chief communications and public policy officer at the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, said her group and other advocates will work to ensure investments are in sync with what voters wanted.

"Voters intended this money to go to homelessness resolution, up through homeownership," Alderman explained. "Voters intended this money to provide rental housing for people at moderate to low incomes."

Proposition 123 will tap 0.1% of tax dollars collected, and proponents noted it will add 10,000 additional affordable housing units per year.

Opponents argued creating a separate funding pool for housing could impact the state's ability to address other core needs. Others warned the measure would deny Colorado taxpayers $145 million in Taxpayer Bill of Rights refunds in the first year alone.

Colorado's median rent, currently nearly $1,900 per month, is expected to reach $2,700 a month in 10 years, which is only affordable for people earning more than $106,000 a year.

Alderman stressed Colorado voters made it clear investments in affordable housing and resolving homelessness were more important than getting a slightly higher Taxpayer Bill of Rights refund.

"Voters said 'I'd rather make an investment in affordable housing so that my elderly parent doesn't age out of their house, or my son or daughter can graduate from college and can move back and afford to live here,' was more important than getting $50 back in their pockets," Alderman outlined.

Even if the measure reaches its goals, Colorado will still be short on the number of available affordable units compared with demand. Alderman pointed out the state has fallen behind when it comes to making the sorts of investments to address the actual scale of the crisis, and has a lot of catching up to do.

"We can't just make these investments and then assume it's going to solve the housing crisis, or solve all of homelessness," Alderman cautioned. "Because during the period that we are making investments, people are going to fall into the cycle of homelessness, and people are going to lose their homes."

Rural New York organizations are working to tackle issues with rural housing. Rural counties throughout the state are suffering from aging housing stock and an ever dwindling supply.

In 2021, the New York State Comptroller found 10 rural counties had 5,500 fewer housing units than in 2016.

Megan Murphy, executive director of the rural housing organization Adirondack Roots, said places like Essex County are seeing the ripple effects of rural New York's housing problems.

"The county itself has dozens of jobs that are going unfilled because one of the hardest parts of this is that hiring in people from outside, they're not able to find housing," Murphy observed. "We're hearing this from health care institutions, we're hearing this from nonprofits, and from others."

She argued solutions require new rental units and affordable housing projects in rural areas. Murphy added while most rural counties are facing a housing shortage, the problems look different in each place. Essex County, for example, needs increased funding for Adirondack Roots' existing home rehabilitation, and New York State's mobile home replacement program.

New York State is investing in rural areas. Several new rental developments have been built across the state in 2023. But Murphy pointed out new projects are expensive and potential renters are already struggling to make ends meet with low wages.

"When you're talking about new builds, it's 'how do we figure out how to create a situation where we can either reduce the cost of building, or create a situation where there is a subsidy for folks so that they can get into new homes?'" Murphy explained.

She emphasized it also applies to maintaining existing homes. Murphy acknowledged there is no silver bullet to the issues surrounding rural housing, but contended it will take an interconnected, holistic approach to solve them.


get more stories like this via email

Advocates for the homeless in Ohio say effective and well-funded federal programs have helped cut the number of homeless veterans nearly in half over the past decade.

Federal agencies with a "housing first approach" have prioritized getting veterans into stable housing quickly without preconditions and provided greater assistance to landlords willing to help.

Marcus Roth, communications/development director for the Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio, said the same approach should apply to all homeless people.

"It's been really refreshing to see that we can make progress for homeless veterans," he said. "If we apply the same approach to other populations, we can help other folks, too."

There are still more than 600 homeless veterans in Ohio, according to federal data.

Advocates for these veterans have said high rental prices and increasing eviction rates statewide could add to that number. Rent prices skyrocketed a year into the pandemic, increasing nearly 25% in Ohio from 2021 to 2022 with Cleveland and Cincinnati alone showing some of the highest rent increases in the country.

Roth said the state's continued lack of affordable housing is driving people into homelessness.

"We hear about tenants that are getting bills with a rent increase of 40% to 50%," Roth said, "and a lot of people can't afford that, and then they look around to find another place to live and they can't find anywhere else that's affordable either."

Roth said the General Assembly's creation of a new affordable-housing tax credit could offer some relief. The Senate Select Committee on Housing has been holding a series of hearings to address the affordable-housing crisis.

This story was produced in association with Media in the Public Interest and funded in part by the George Gund Foundation.


get more stories like this via email

A Connecticut group is holding several roundtable discussions about ways to end homelessness.

The Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness is speaking with elected officials to bridge the gap between understanding what it will take to reduce homelessness in the state and actually ending it. Between 2021 and 2022, a point-in-time report tracked a 13% increase in homelessness on a single January night. This year's report saw an almost 3% increase.

Sarah Fox, CEO of the Connecticut Coalition for Ending Homelessness, said the numbers are trending up for several reasons.

"They're becoming homeless due to poverty from returning back to the community after incarceration, from just generally not being able to thrive in the current environment," Fox observed. "We also know that you cannot uncouple homelessness from the affordable housing crisis."

Other reasons people are becoming homeless include the economic impacts of the pandemic, and rising rents. While Fox is eager to see progress, she is aware of the challenges ahead. In addition to competing fiscal priorities in the General Assembly, there is also the need to raise funds for homeless service systems. She said helping legislators understand the pressure the system is under to serve a growing population is a step in the right direction.

During the past session, the group brought legislation to the General Assembly to allocate funds to begin work necessary to end homelessness. The bill called for $50 million in funding to improve Connecticut's Homeless Response System.

Fox noted lawmakers approved far less.

"We received in total, $7 million, including $5 million for shelters, and $2 million that the Gov. had issued for flexible funding subsidies."

She added though it was not nearly enough, it is more money than other groups and causes got, many of whom received nothing.

As winter approaches, Fox is concerned about how to keep the growing elderly homeless population safe. A National Alliance to End Homelessness report predicted senior homelessness will grow from 40,000 to 106,000 by 2030.


get more stories like this via email