Pension Overhaul for ND Under Microscope
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
North Dakota is eyeing changes to the retirement plan offered to state employees.
Future hires would be moved to a "defined contribution" plan, but there are concerns it would negatively affect the ability to attract workers.
Conservative-leaning groups such as Americans for Prosperity, as well as the bill sponsors, say the North Dakota Public Employees Retirement System has an unfunded liability of $1.8 billion. They want to move away from a defined pension benefit to a 401k-style system, which would rely on investments.
Kendal Killian, executive director of the National Public Pension Coalition, said it does not make sense to overhaul one of the key selling points for those in the public sector.
"They usually get paid a little bit less in their salary," Killian pointed out. "They usually have a good work-life balance. But they really do it because of the superior benefits; health care benefits and retirement benefits."
The bill in question was introduced in the House. Opponents argued the state should instead embrace a Senate plan, which would commit funds to shore up the pension system but would also give future hires the option to select a defined-contribution plan. They suggested it could help ease any concerns about appeasing younger workers who might want more flexibility with their retirement options.
Still, Killian contended the main conversation should center around trying to protect the pension system.
Beyond issues with attracting and retaining workers, he noted public-sector employees who receive the benefit can retire with more certainty, which helps the state's economy.
"If you jeopardize the pension of these workers, you're also jeopardizing the residual economic benefits that pumping these dollars into the state does," Killian stressed. "And (that) will eventually create kind of a domino or chain reaction that can affect everyone."
The group pointed out in places such as Alaska and Palm Beach, Florida, the closing of pension systems had unintended consequences, where extra costs were incurred to recruit and train workers to fill staffing voids.
The House plan has been estimated to cost roughly $5 billion over 20 years, but sponsors emphasized it would quickly bring more stability to the system. Backers of the Senate plan countered it is less costly in the long run, while still offering a pension to new hires.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota's farming landscape is seeing policy shifts dealing with corporate ownership of agricultural interests. Now, there's fresh debate at the …
Advocates for unpaid family caregivers in Maine say they'll need continued support beyond the recently passed paid family and medical leave program…
The Students for Justice in Palestine chapters at the University of Florida and the University of South Florida are filing lawsuits against the deacti…
A new report from WGU Labs, a nonprofit affiliate of Western Governors University based in Millcreek, Utah, is shedding light on the importance of …
Many older residents of Washington state are facing strains on their budgets -- and the government programs that could assist them are underused…
Bloomington and Indianapolis are getting some international recognition for the work they're doing to help the environment. The two have been named …
Health and Wellness
New Mexico activists are tapping today's World AIDS Day, Dec. 1, to announce they'll ask the State Legislature to provide more money for treatment …
Bipartisan legislation that proposes the installation of solar panels in schools across Pennsylvania awaits a vote in the state Senate. The Solar …