For Missourians with a disability, earning too much money, or having a spouse earn too much, can mean losing important Medicaid health coverage.

State Rep. Melanie Stinnett, R-Springfield, said she observed this problem when young people she had worked with as a speech therapist shared some of the struggles they faced after entering the workforce. Stinnett introduced House Bill 970 to increase how much both an individual and their spouse can earn before losing Medicaid benefits. She said Medicaid covers indispensable services, such as personal-care assistance.

"Individuals that come and help these individuals get up, get out of bed, get showered and dressed sometimes, so that they can get out and get to work," she said.

HB 970 would raise the amount a single Missourian with a disability can earn without losing benefits from roughly $41,000 to $88,000 per year, and married couples from $88,000 to $116,000. Although this may sound high, Stinnett said, the cost to pay for personal-care assistance out of pocket can be substantial, and many private insurance companies don't cover it.

An in-home health aide for just three hours a day in Missouri can cost more than $25,000 a year.

HB 970 also would remove the first $50,000 a spouse earns from consideration in the couple's total income. She said it's an important piece of the bill that could solve an unintended problem.

"We have inadvertently disincentivized marriage," she said, "in that individuals with disabilities are often choosing to either not get married, or sometimes even choosing to get divorced, so that they don't lose those necessary benefits."

Missourian Rachel Baskerville, who lives with a disability, said she feels lowering the impact a spouse's income has on one's eligibility is a matter of equalizing things.

"Non-disabled people don't have to look at certain restrictions with who they fall in love with and who they marry," she said, "and so I feel like, as a person with a disability, I shouldn't have to look under certain guidelines to see who I can fall in love with."

Stinnett also introduced House Bill 971 this session, which would require state agencies to submit annual reports showing steps they've taken to recruit, hire and advance individuals with disabilities.

A proposed measure in Illinois aims to improve access to the ballot for visually impaired voters.

Senate Bill 282, introduced by Sen. Julie Morrison, D-Lake Forest, would permit people who are considered blind or have low vision, or those with learning and physical disabilities equating to a "print disability," to vote electronically by mail.

Paula Balistreri, operations manager at the Central Illinois Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired, said there are challenges with the current process.

"Typically they will have a sighted person with them who will read it out loud and mark it for them," Balistreri explained. "It's tricky because not everyone has someone they want to share that with. To vote in person presents another whole list of challenges, not the least of which is how do they get there?"

Supporters believe the bill will allow people with visual impairments to mark their ballot confidentially, without the assistance of other people. However, there are some concerns the new provision will cause confusion, as federal law already mandates at least one touch screen and audio voting booth be at all polling locations for federal elections. There is also concern about security associated with electronic voting.

Opponents say the bill is unnecessary since currently at least one accessible voting machine is required at every polling location.

Aaron Ammons, Champaign County Clerk, added there are even better options, including the Express Vote machine used in his county for people with visual impairments.

"It will read the ballot to them and they can make choices on a pad," Ammons pointed out. "It certainly has Braille, and for those who are having low vision, we also have the ability to enhance the font as well as use different contrast."

People worried about electronic voting security are pushing back. A state board task force has regular meetings planned to get closer to a model. As of January this year, 31 states allow certain voters, including those with disabilities, to return absentee or mail-in ballots electronically.


get more stories like this via email

A man in Adel who is part of Iowa's community of people with disabilities has been successful in having an electronic door installed at the U.S. Post Office in town.

Robert Fisher, who uses a motorized wheelchair to get around, has been able to get pretty much anywhere he wanted to go until he got to his local post office. Until now, the Adel post office has not had a wheelchair friendly door.

Fisher, who has been forced to call the post office ahead of his arrival so someone could let him in, has finally succeeded after a monthslong battle in having an electronic, accessible button installed.

"I feel happy," Fisher said. "It feels rewarding. And other people can use, that too."

Prior to the installation of the button, Fisher had to prop the door open with his hands and feet while maneuvering his wheelchair inside, which he said felt demeaning. Fisher, who said, "my work is never done," is hoping to expand his efforts to other places in Iowa which are not as accessible to people with disabilities as they should be.

Brooke Lovelace, executive director of the Iowa Council on Developmental Disabilities, calls Fisher's success a step in the right direction and a significant accomplishment at the local level, but added Adel's post office door should start not only a statewide trend to increase accessibility in Iowa, but also serve as an opportunity for officials to reexamine the current Americans with Disabilities Act.

"To make it more modernized with what the standards are today, to truly be accessible," Lovelace urged. "It is 30 years old, and so let's open the ADA back up and see how we can update it to make it, so it meets everybody's needs."

While the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed by President George H.W. Bush in 1990, its roots actually date to the early 1970s, when the federal government started to define what discrimination meant in the context of being a disabled person.

With key deadlines approaching at the Iowa statehouse, advocates are calling on lawmakers to provide better wages for direct service professionals, the health care workers who support people with disabilities in the community.

At an average of about $14 an hour, the pay is poor and the work notoriously challenging, which makes it hard for providers to attract and retain workers in the field.

Mona Kenyon, CEO of Iowa City-based Systems Unlimited, a health care provider, they are 98% Medicaid funded, so companies like hers are calling on the state for higher reimbursement rates.

"People have other opportunities," Kenyon acknowledged. "We don't get the applications. We don't keep staff. It's a constant revolving door. So we're pushing to draw awareness and to say this is a real problem. "

Currently, 96% of provider agencies in Iowa have vacancies for direct service professionals.

Kenyon pointed out companies like hers often compete for workers with fast food restaurants because of the low pay, but noted the work providers do is valuable for people with disabilities and helps them stay in their homes.

"It can range depending on the needs," Kenyon explained. "People need assistance with personal care, with bathing, getting ready for their day, getting ready to go to work. Other people need help with grocery shopping, balancing their checkbook. So, it really does range, but without the direct support professionals, services cannot be provided."

To attract and retain more direct service professionals, Iowa's lawmakers are considering House File 264, which would eliminate the state income tax for in-home health care providers, saving them up to $1,300 a year.


get more stories like this via email