Una demanda en Colorado que está recibiendo mucha atención nacional ya tiene como objetivo eliminar al expresidente Donald Trump de las elecciones primarias presidenciales del estado. El grupo Ciudadanos por la Responsabilidad y la Ética en Washington o CREW busca destituir al expresidente, citando la Sección 3ª de la 14 Enmienda. Este lenguaje posterior a la Guerra Civil dice que cualquiera que haya jurado apoyar la Constitución de Estados Unidos y luego se involucre en una rebelión o insurrección debería ser descalificado para ocupar un cargo. El asesor principal de CREW, Donald Sherman, describe cómo los otros juicios del expresidente podrían afectar este caso en particular.

"La condena del expresidente en cualquiera de los muchos juicios penales que enfrenta -pero especialmente el caso de Georgia y el caso de Jack Smith, que están relacionados con el 6 de enero- podría reforzar el ya abrumador caso público contra el expresidente," analizó también Sherman.

Agrega que no se requiere una condena penal para que una persona sea descalificada según la Sección 3ª de la 14 Enmienda. Trump ha dicho que no hay base para utilizar esta teoría legal. Pero en agosto, miembros de la conservadora Sociedad Federalista escribieron un documento diciendo que el ex presidente podría ser descalificado a través de la 14 Enmienda.

Basándose en esto, Sherman señala que otros funcionarios electos que participaron en la insurrección del 6 de enero también podrían ser destituidos de su cargo de esta manera. CREW destituyó de su cargo a Couy Griffin, ex comisionado del condado de Otero, por participar el 6 de enero. Sherman señala que podría sentar un precedente.

"Sin duda, el caso debería considerarse persuasivo en cualquier futuro caso de descalificación contra el ex presidente. Es el primer caso judicial en el que un juez determina, como cuestión de derecho, que el 6 de enero fue una insurrección," insistió además el entrevistado.

Sherman espera que la demanda conduzca en última instancia a que todos los funcionarios electos que formaron parte de la insurrección rindan cuentas. Agrega que no se trata de partidismo o diferencias ideológicas, sino que se basa en cómo numerosos juristas han interpretado la 14 Enmienda y han descubierto que la Sección 3ª podría usarse para descalificar al expresidente.

Apoyo para esta historia fue proporcionado por la Carnegie Corporation of New York


get more stories like this via email

North Dakota's June 11 primary is inching closer and those running for legislative seats are trying to win over voters, including Native American candidates who are part of a movement energized by newly drawn political boundaries.

The organization North Dakota Native Vote said there are seven candidates with Indigenous roots seeking spots in the Legislature. Most are running in District 9, which was recently updated to reflect representation needs for two Native American tribes.

Natasha Gourd, a board member of North Dakota Native Vote, described them as a good mixture of candidates coming from both reservations in the area, with some running as Democrats and others as Republicans.

"We've seen an upturn in participation and just getting leadership development through Native candidates," Gourd observed.

The election wave comes after the state saw 10 Native candidates in legislative races two years ago. For her group, Gourd acknowledged the boost can be tricky because they cannot endorse everyone running. But she noted having greater assurances the areas will be represented by people from their community -- no matter if they have a different stance on certain issues -- is still a positive.

Gourd added trying to build on the momentum is also important for off-reservation districts.

"What they do at the state level, regardless of Native American people in North Dakota (being part of) federally recognized tribes, it does affect us," Gourd pointed out. "Most Natives in North Dakota do live off the reservation, so it does affect our populations."

Gourd stressed they need more Native voices at the state level speaking out about priorities within education, the housing crisis, energy issues and health care. She hopes the positive trends they're seeing inspire more civic participation among other racial and ethnic groups trying to get a seat at the policy table in North Dakota.

A new poll finds a near 20-year low in the number of voters who say they have a high interest in the 2024 election, with a majority saying they hold negative views of both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump. A group of Arizona elections officials and experts recently gathered to discuss the growing discontent with the state's current electoral landscape.

Stephen Richer, Maricopa County Recorder, said that if politicians are what he calls "single-minded seekers of re-election," he contends the state should change the political incentive structure.

"And if those incentives will change, then maybe we will be talking about more things in the Arizona Voter's Agenda and less things that are currently right now incentivized by what I still believe to be a minority, but a very passionate, very loud, and a minority that is definitely committed to acting on those issues," he said.

Richer added it is important to remember that despite Independent and unaffiliated voters being able to participate in the July 30th statewide primary, they were excluded from the state's March Presidential Preference Election, and that has caught the eye of some in the state. The bipartisan group Make Elections Fair Arizona is pushing for open primaries, but proponents of closed primaries believe they're crucial to maintaining the integrity of party ideals.

Amanda Burke, executive vice president with the non-partisan, nonprofit organization Center for the Future of Arizona, said more than half of unaffiliated voters do not feel they have leaders or candidates running who speak to the issues and causes they care about. She contends that then translates to who decides to show up at the ballot box and vote, and encourages Arizonans to imagine a different primary system if they want different outcomes.

"Otherwise we are going to continue to have some more outcomes in terms of people who are incentivized to speak to a small percentage of their base on either side who are really not representative of the larger views," she explained.

The Grand Canyon State allows voter-initiated amendments to the state constitution, but the Arizona Require Partisan Primary Elections Amendment would add the state's current primary practice to the state constitution, prohibiting future changes without another constitutional amendment. Make Elections Fair Arizona is still collecting signatures to get its measure on the November ballot.


get more stories like this via email

Wisconsin women have made progress in closing gaps when it comes to being elected to public office.

But some voices worry the movement might slow down as candidates see increasing levels of threats and harassment.

The Brennan Center for Justice recently issued findings that detail the threatening behavior those in the political arena are experiencing now.

Women were three to four times as likely as men to experience abuse targeting their gender.

Erin Vilardi, CEO and founder of the advocacy and assistance group Vote Run Lead, said this creates more unfairness in areas such as resource planning for a campaign.

"We see women candidates and incumbents right now having to pay for security," said Vilardi, "having to put in their budgets, in their campaign funds, in their line-items for their campaigns a security detail."

And Vilardi said because of the worsening climate, the threats are extending to almost all other candidates, including conservative white men.

She and other researchers called on party leaders to strongly condemn political violence. They also recommend that each state implement stronger protection for officeholders.

Vilardi said it's not just women candidates and incumbents having to deal with this behavior. Women working as top aides and political journalists are subject to more hateful rhetoric these days.

"This is something that permeates women in politics," said Vilardi, "not just for the folks that are stepping up to lead but for the ecosystem of women around them."

And if more women decide not to run or seek re-election as a result, Vilardi said this means there will be fewer opportunities for gender equality in leadership positions in state legislatures and Congress.

She urged constituents to send messages of support to women officeholders as they weigh these challenges and their political futures.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.



get more stories like this via email