Pennsylvania governments could save taxpayers millions and reduce pollution by transitioning their fleets to electric vehicles, according to findings from a recent report.
Currently, there are more than 40,000 electric vehicles registered in the Keystone State, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Flora Cardoni, field director for the PennEnvironment Research and Policy Center, said government shifting to electric vehicles would significantly reduce fuel and maintenance costs, while also improving air quality. She added Pennsylvania could save taxpayers more than $360 million dollars by transitioning government fleets to electric vehicles.
"The switch to electric vehicles, to light-duty vehicles, would also reduce global warming pollution in Pennsylvania by more than 800,000 tons, emitting 64% less than vehicles powered by gasoline," Cardoni reported. "That's huge, and helping us tackle the climate crisis. And then at the same time, the switch would also clean up our air and protect our health."
Cardoni pointed out it would also reduce carbon monoxide emissions by 94%, volatile organic compound emissions by 92%, and nitrogen oxide emissions by 31%. She noted in the United States, transportation is the number one source of global-warming pollution contributing to the climate crisis.
Cardoni emphasized federal incentives such as the commercial clean vehicle credit, which passed as part of the Inflation Reduction Act, would make it easier and more affordable for the Pennsylvania government to make the switch to electric vehicles.
"They offer savings of up to $7,500 per light-duty vehicle and can help offset those upfront costs," Cardoni explained. "But really, most of the cost savings come from the fact that buying and fueling and maintaining gas and diesel-fueled vehicle fleets is a major expense for state and local governments, especially when gas prices are high."
Cardoni stressed the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment in JOBS Act provide government entities with funding for building electric vehicle charging stations. She added the report offers recommendations for Pennsylvania governments to help to save money, reduce pollution, and improve air quality for all residents.
get more stories like this via email
Clean-energy companies and supporters are calling on federal officials to prioritize the development of charging infrastructure for EV powered medium and heavy duty trucks in Pennsylvania and across the nation.
Trucks transported more than 11 billion tons of freight last year, spewing air pollutants and greenhouse gases along the way.
John Boesel, CEO of CALSTART, a clean-transportation nonprofit group, said the EPA's "Phase 3" program would greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from all commercial vehicles, improving the health and safety of communities.
"Going forward in the future, we can see a society where we have trucks rolling around with zero-emission and zero-noise and really benefiting communities over the decades that have been hard hit by diesel pollution and emission," Boesel explained.
Pennsylvania has taken a significant step toward electrifying its transportation system with the installation of its first federally funded electric-vehicle charging station in Pittston. Some in the trucking industry have concerns about EV costs, mileage, range, battery safety, charging time and availability.
Boesel emphasized the importance of the Biden administration implementing robust regulations to strengthen the United States' position as a global leader and drive meaningful progress toward the Paris Agreement's objectives. He contends the Inflation Reduction Act provides a lot of incentives for investment in U.S. electric battery technology and production.
"The Inflation Reduction Act will really help spur the growth of the zero-emission commercial vehicle industry. And I think this will end up being a real benefit for the United States from an economic perspective, and from an environmental perspective," Boesel added.
Boesel pointed out the United States is one of 27 nations that have agreed to non-binding targets, which suggests that 30% of all new commercial vehicles sold could be zero emission by 2030.
Disclosure: The Partnership Project contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Energy Policy, Environment. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A new plan takes an interconnected approach to saving Virginia's coastal wetlands.
The aim of Virginia's York River and Small Coastal Basin Roundtable is to conserve tidal wetlands and increase coordination among regional stakeholders. Virginia's wetlands face multiple threats, from rising sea levels due to climate change to invasive species and commercial development. But 99% of the state's coastal land is privately owned.
Andrew Larkin, senior program analyst at the Chesapeake Bay Office for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said public-private partnerships are a key component to making the plan work.
"There are funding opportunities, both at the state and federal level, where property owners can seek funds to help construct or maintain living shorelines on their property," Larkin explained. "A living shoreline would be a desire to incorporate natural elements into a shoreline, rather than a traditional sea wall or something along those lines that doesn't provide as many benefits."
As beneficial as partnerships can be, having most coastal wetlands on private land still poses a challenge. He advised people to consider the benefits wetlands provide against climate change. The U.S. Geological Survey said wetlands can capture greenhouse gases and store them for hundreds of thousands of years.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said wetlands cover 5.5% of the 48 contiguous states, with one million wetland acres in Virginia alone.
Pamela Mason, senior research scientist for the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at the College of William and Mary, said the plan will affect stewardship of those wetlands in numerous ways.
"The plan helps frame specific places, like wetlands complexes that exist in the Middle Peninsula, as places to focus some of the research," Mason pointed out. "To build on the wetlands that are already there; maybe do something that some people call pre-restoration; so, planning for wetlands migration."
She stressed if implemented, the plan can create wetland growth. The plan was being developed before the U.S. Supreme Court ruling this spring in Sackett v. EPA, which ended federal protections for most wetlands. But Mason noted some state laws are still in place to protect them.
Support for this reporting was provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
get more stories like this via email
Wildlife corridor conservation is in the spotlight in Congress.
Last week, the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Fisheries, Water and Wildlife held a hearing on wildlife corridors, which are important for animal migration in the winter and summer months and can be impeded by fractured landscapes. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., is a member of the subcommittee.
Madeleine West, director of the Center for Public Lands at the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, said protecting wildlife corridors is the top issue for hunting and fishing organizations.
"Abundant wildlife populations of big game species and small game species even, like waterfowl, are important to the TRCP and our partners and the 14 million hunters in this country," West explained.
Corridor conservation has been a bipartisan issue. It was a priority at a recent meeting in Wyoming of the Western Governors' Association. A Department of the Interior Secretarial Order from 2018 under the Trump administration provided financial support for research and on-the-ground work to conserve corridors. The order was expanded under the Biden administration.
West acknowledged the support has been helpful but argued the federal government could make more strategic investments.
"Dedicated and consistent federal funding would be very valuable," West pointed out. "Importantly, it's critical that coordination between federal, state and tribal agencies, as well as private landowners and hunting, fishing and conservation organizations continue and be fostered."
West noted conservation work has not just happened on the federal level. She added there are lots of opportunities to work with private landowners on voluntary conservation projects.
"Some of the best wildlife habitat and corridor habitat is on private land in this country," West stressed. "Because private landowners have done so much proactive, voluntary conservation work on their own to have outstanding habitat quality."
Disclosure: The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Endangered Species & Wildlife, Environment, and Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email