By Kristi Eaton for The Daily Yonder.
Broadcast version by Deborah Van Fleet for Nebraska News Connection reporting for The Daily Yonder-Public News Service Collaboration

The links between climate change, farmers and nutrition in low-income countries is a matter of national security in the United States, said an official with the Farm Journal Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that released a new report.

"If you're hungry, you're going to do just about anything you need to do to feed yourself and your family, especially if you are a mom, and you will go hungry yourself to feed your child," Katie Lee, vice president of government affairs at Farm Journal Foundation, told the Daily Yonder.

"That leads to all sorts of challenging situations where that is more of an issue. We still have hungry people in the United States. But it is a far more dire issue in lower-income countries - just in terms of sheer percentage of populations of people who are dealing with either acute hunger where they're on the brink of starvation, or general hunger, where they're not having regular access to food, let alone nutritious food."

Lee was referring to a study that found weather events over the past several years have led to lower harvests, lost agricultural incomes and increasing food prices. All those factors contribute to increasing rates of malnutrition, according to the report by Ramya Ambikapathi and Daniel Mason-D'Croz, senior research associates at Cornell University's College of Agriculture and Life Sciences' Department of Global Development.

About 3 billion people around the world are unable to afford a well-balanced, healthy diet that includes whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and animal-sourced foods, the study found. People in low- and middle-income countries, where farming is often the main source of income, are feeling the brunt of the impact.

Women farmers were a centerpiece to the report.

Ambikapathi, one of the report authors, said women feel the impacts of climate change more severely than men due to higher exposure and sensitivity. She pointed out that a crop loss or a small pest infestation can have devastating effects because they cannot address it as easily because of lower access to information and financial services compared to men.

"I think one of the more classic (impacts is that when women are primarily responsible for getting water, and the more you see drought-like conditions, (they) have to go further and further," Ambikapathi said in a Zoom interview with the Daily Yonder. "There's also a lot of new reports that come out that gender-based violence increases with climate change."

Study co-author Mason-D'Croz echoed that sentiment. Vulnerable groups have less access to resources, he said.

"When you do have some sort of an external shock, whether climate, pests and disease, economic shock of some sort - these groups almost always are the ones who get hit the hardest, because they have the least capacity to absorb it," Mason-D'Croz said in a Zoom interview.

The report makes recommendations for what U.S. policymakers can do to support global nutrition security. The recommendations include supporting investments in agricultural research and development; investing in programs that benefit women's nutrition and womenwho work in agriculture and food systems; and increasing support for programs that improve farmers' access to finance, among other recommendations.

Lee said the study points to policy actions the U.S. could take. "We have lots of opportunities through appropriations and funding and the Farm Bill to support ag development and innovation, and address challenges like climate change, global hunger and malnutrition and things like high input costs that hurt farmers, bottom lines, and more," she said.

In addition to global nutrition being a U.S. national security issue, Lee said there are also concerns about pests and health risks, including animal diseases. Thirdly, there are economic and trade angles that suggest a focus on climate change and global nutrition should be a U.S. priority.

"If we're looking at where the trade opportunities are going forward, it's in places like Africa," Lee said. "And there are huge markets and a huge rapidly growing population, where, through working with smallholder farmers to try to build up incomes in those countries, there's a huge opportunity for U.S. agriculture."

Finally, she added, it's simply the right thing to do.

"We should be taking a view that anyone who is hungry in this world, any child or a mother, who is hungry, is not acceptable," she said.


Kristi Eaton wrote this article for The Daily Yonder.


get more stories like this via email

A central Montana food bank has seen more traffic since it expanded last fall and as Congress considers cuts to safety-net programs including grocery dollars, food bank staff know they may be affected.

In 2024, Helena Food Share served more than 4,000 households total. Now, it serves roughly 1,700 households each month.

Jordan Evertz, executive director of Helena Food Share, said they relocated in October and the new Community Food Resource Center allows for increased offerings, including a more effective grocery rescue program, which reallocates foods from grocery stores that have passed their "sell-by" dates.

"One aspect of our new building is our commercial kitchen space," Evertz pointed out. "We are able to reproduce that food into individual meals and product that goes out into the market for customers."

Cuts to safety-net programs proposed in the federal budget bill could bring in more community members seeking food support. Evertz emphasized funding for Helena Food Share largely comes from the community, so while potential federal budget cuts will affect operations, they will not close their doors.

The American Heart Association contributed to Helena Food Share's expansion by funding construction of its large refrigeration space.

Cherish Hart, western state regional vice president of community impact for the association, said it offers grants for many organizations focused on healthy food.

"We know that food insecurity has been rising," Hart acknowledged. "We've been trying to work with more organizations on tackling that food insecurity, but thinking about it with that lens of nutrition as well."

She added the association has provided grants for produce wash stations and freeze-drying machines.

By Seth Millstein for Sentient.
Broadcast version by Nadia Ramlagan for West Virginia News Service reporting for the Sentient-Public News Service Collaboration

The House Republicans have now passed the sweeping piece of budgetary legislation requested by President Trump. Colloquially known as the “megabill,” the legislation passed by a single vote with no Democratic support, and is primarily aimed at extending the tax cuts for wealthy Americans that Trump signed in 2017. But the megabill contains significant agriculture and food-related provisions as well, including cuts to food stamps and financial assistance to meat and dairy producers.

It’s worth noting at the top that this bill isn’t yet law, and won’t become law until the Senate passes it as well. As is usually the case with big pieces of legislation, the Senate will likely pass its own version of the bill, which will then need to be reconciled with the House bill and then passed in identical form by both chambers.

In other words, none of this is set in stone yet, and the bill will almost certainly change before becoming law. Although there are some debates within the Republican caucus over what provisions the final bill will include, the broad strokes will likely remain the same, says Andrew deCoriolis, executive director of Farm Forward.

“The bill is really a grab bag of Republican and meat and dairy industry interests,” deCoriolis tells Sentient. “The disagreement is really not whether or not we should be cutting taxes and giving tax breaks to big companies and millionaires and billionaires, but whether we should cut more social safety net programs to pay for it.”

Let’s take a look at what’s in the megabill, and how it will — and won’t — affect American farming and food systems.

No EATS Act

The GOP’s 2024 farm bill proposal, which did not pass, included a version of the EATS Act, a highly controversial bill that would ban states from enacting laws that interfere with the interstate commerce of agricultural products.

The primary goal of the EATS Act — as well as its more-recent successor, the Food Security & Farm Protection Act — is to overturn California’s Proposition 12, which requires farmers to give egg-laying hens, pigs and veal calves a certain amount of living space in animal farms (a modest increase of space from standard factory farms). The law also requires that all eggs, pork and veal sold in the state be produced in accordance with these requirements, even if the products were produced out of state.

Republican lawmakers did insert some of the 2024 farm bill’s provisions into the megabill. But the EATS Act wasn’t one of them; the megabill contains no language that would diminish, weaken or overturn Proposition 12.

The reason for this — one of them, at least — is that Republicans in the Senate plan on passing the megabill using budget reconciliation, a legislative maneuver that allows lawmakers to circumvent any potential filibuster and pass a bill with only 51 votes. But the tradeoff is that any bill passed using budget reconciliation can only include budget-related provisions, and overturning Proposition 12 has nothing to do with federal spending. As such, it wasn’t, and couldn’t have been, included.

Because the megabill contains some components of the proposed 2024 farm bill, its successful passage could make a new farm bill an even lower priority for lawmakers than it already is. And while this is pure speculation, this could be good news for Proposition 12, as the farm bill was the primary mechanism by which Republicans were attempting to repeal the California law.

Cutting SNAP Funding

SNAP is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, otherwise known as food stamps. Around 41 million Americans receive SNAP benefits every year, which they can use to buy groceries.

The megabill cuts federal SNAP funding by around $300 million over the next decade, ostensibly by shifting some of the cost burden to states. The reason this is being characterized as a cut in funding, rather than simply a redistribution of the cost burden, is that there’s no guarantee that any state will be both willing and able to cover the difference.

Historically, the federal government has funded 100 percent of the SNAP program. The megabill breaks from this tradition by requiring states to fund at least five percent, and potentially up to 25 percent, of SNAP benefits that their residents receive. The exact percentage depends on each state’s historical “error rate,” or the frequency with which it has over- or under-paid SNAP recipients in the past.

States with higher error rates will have to shoulder a bigger share of SNAP funding. An analysis of historical error rates by Center for Budget and Policy Priorities found that, if the past is any guide, every state other than South Dakota will potentially have to fund 15 percent or more of its SNAP benefits in at least some years under the new bill.

This isn’t the only way in which the bill slashes SNAP funding. In addition to paying for the benefits themselves, the federal government also reimburses states for the cost of administering SNAP, but the megabill will reduce that funding from 50 percent to 25 percent, again shifting more costs to individual states. It also raises the age threshold of the program’s already-stringent work requirements from 54 to 64.

“It’s not subtle in what it’s doing,” deCoriolis says. “This bill seems like a massive transfer of wealth from hungry Americans and low-to-medium income Americans who rely on supplemental food programs.”

Subsidies For Big Meat And Dairy

The megabill also increases subsidies for the meat and dairy industries, both of which are already heavily subsidized by the federal government.

First, it increases both the amount of money that dairy producers receive through the Dairy Margin Coverage Program and the number of producers who are eligible for the program. This is a price stabilization program aimed at protecting the economic wellbeing of the dairy industry when milk prices fall below certain levels.

“That’s a direct transfer of wealth,” deCoriolis says of the DMC expansion. “That’s a direct giveaway to dairy companies.”

Similarly, the bill raises the reference prices for the USDA’s commodity programs, which function similarly to the DMC but for things like rice and wheat instead of dairy. In effect, this means that the government will subsidize farmers of these commodities even more generously than they already do.

The bill also increases funding and eligibility for various livestock subsidy programs, which compensate livestock farmers when their animals are killed by predators or disease. As deCoriolis notes, many vertically-integrated agribusinesses produce both livestock and grains to feed the livestock, and thus stand to benefit in both cases from the megabill’s increased support levels.

“[They’ll] get subsidies on both ends of the production,” deCoriolis says. “It’s a smart way to capture even more taxpayer dollars.”

Tax Credits for Biofuels

The bill eliminates most of the clean energy tax credits established by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), but retains and actually extends one: The 45Z tax credit. Officially known as the Clean Fuel Production Credit, it’s ostensibly aimed at providing a tax incentive for producers of clean transportation fuels; in practice, however, it’s most commonly claimed by producers of biofuels, the environmental benefits of which are highly questionable at best.

This is relevant to agriculture because biofuels are often produced using manure from factory farms, which themselves cause an enormous amount of environmental destruction in a number of different ways. As such, large industrial animal farms that produce biofuels will financially benefit from the extension of the 45Z tax credit.

“It’s just a biofuel expansion program,” deCoriolis says. “Our own investigation from earlier this year showed that a lot of the IRA money that was going to biodigesters was being used to help expand factory farms, especially in the Midwest. This bill would substantially expand the 45Z credit program, and would give it another four years of life.”

Other Provisions

The megabill is over 1,000 pages long, and contains a number of other measures that will affect American agriculture. It increases crop insurance subsidies and tax deductions for businesses that include farms, and reduces the estate tax, which taxes the inheritance of property.

This last provision is relevant to agriculture because farms are frequently passed from generation to generation in the same family.

“You’ve got a lot of ranchers who pass on these extremely large, valuable ranches in their wills, and they don’t want to pay taxes on it,” deCoriolis says.

What Happens Next

With all of that being said, it’s worth stressing again that this bill will almost certainly undergo changes if and before it becomes law. DeCoriolis notes that the Republican Senate caucus includes some moderate lawmakers who might object to the megabill’s spending cuts, which apply not only to SNAP but also Medicare and Medicaid.

“Those are programs that literally every American in every geography uses, [including] lots and lots of constituents in the states that are represented by Republican Senators,” deCoriolis says. “I could see them kicking a different version of the bill back to the House, and then having to have some reconciliation process between those versions of the bill.”

Ultimately, we won’t know for sure until the Senate passes its version of the bill — and given that Republicans have only a three-seat majority in that chamber, it may be quite a while until that happens.


Seth Millstein wrote this article for Sentient.


get more stories like this via email

As food insecurity rises across the state, groups fighting hunger are highlighting the need for food that is not only nutritious, but culturally relevant.

Leialoha Kaula is the executive director of the nonprofit KALO HCC, which serves Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities in Oregon and Southwest Washington.

The organization started distributing food boxes during the pandemic, and Kaula said the food didn't always meet people's needs - because it wasn't familiar, or they didn't know how to use it.

In response, she said, KALO started including traditional foods in the boxes, like taro root and coconut.

"We saw that it was not just hunger for food, it was that hunger for culture," said Kaula. "It was that hunger for home, that's what was filled."

Visits to food banks in the state have risen sharply in the last year, and data shows Pacific Islander Oregonians are twice as likely to experience hunger than their white neighbors.

Kaula said KALO HCC has also started cultivating taro, a Native Hawaiian staple, and encouraging people to get involved in the project.

"Even though we're here in Oregon, that's still a connection to home," said Kaula. "It's about how we as Indigenous people are caring for the land."

Amid federal cuts to food programs, Kaula said she wants to see Oregon focus more on providing culturally relevant foods, so all communities in the state can thrive.

"To really, truly have a healthy Oregon," said Kaula, "we have to make sure that we're serving all the communities in a way that makes them feel seen, heard, and feed them in that way."