In the new year, college applications in Minnesota will look a little different: They will no longer feature an initial question about a person's criminal history, a move supporters said creates better futures for those seeking higher education.
A new state law just took effect, prohibiting Minnesota's public and private colleges and universities from asking about applicants' criminal past on the initial forms they fill out, except for programs such as law enforcement.
Sen. Clare Oumou Verbeten, DFL-St. Paul, sponsored the bill and she said by boosting access to higher education, they are giving applicants an outlet to reconcile with their past and chart a new course.
"It's about giving people an opportunity to explain their stories and their situations and not putting them in a position where they don't even want to try," Verbeten explained. "That's really the hardest thing about when there is that box is a lot of people just give up."
The change is a recommendation from the federal Beyond the Box report of 2023. Research shows nearly two-thirds of those who disclosed felony convictions did not submit their application. Amid efforts across the U.S., some schools still express concern about public safety. Verbeten argued Minnesota's law strikes a good balance and gives schools the opportunity to follow up before a student is enrolled.
Will Cooley, policy director for the Minnesota Justice Research Center, testified in favor of the plan. He said generally speaking, similar moves have enjoyed bipartisan support, including in conservative states like Louisiana.
"I have worked on Ban the Box campaigns in the past," Cooley recounted. "One thing that really struck me was the broad swath of supporters, religious congregations, chambers of commerce, formerly incarcerated people, the list goes on."
The federal report cited findings showing no significant difference between the campus crime rates of schools emphasizing looking into applicants' criminal background and institutions which did not. The authors also noted educational achievement reduces recidivism by 48%, easing pressure on state and federal budgets when factoring incarceration costs.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Ohio Senate Bill 1 is drawing strong reactions across the state, particularly from students in higher education. The bill, which its supporters say aims to promote institutional neutrality, has been met with vocal opposition from students and faculty who argue it threatens academic freedom.
Clara Conover, lead organizer at the Ohio Student Association, points to the overwhelming response against the bill.
"There has not been one single public university student testifying for this bill or openly supporting it. And I think that that goes a really long way to represent how harmful Senate Bill 1 would be for higher ed," she explained.
Despite strong student opposition, proponents of SB 1 argue that the legislation is necessary to ensure political neutrality in classrooms and prevent ideological bias. The bill, introduced by Sen. Jerry Cirino, R-Columbus, would restrict diversity-related programs and require universities to remain neutral on controversial topics.
As the debate over SB 1 continues, students have been actively protesting its progression through the Legislature. The Ohio Student Association recently staged a silent protest at the Statehouse, symbolizing what they describe as grief over the bill's potential impact. Conover emphasized the broader implications of this legislation.
"This bill would make our universities ... like, it would drive students out of Ohio and then it would make sure that no one else came here for college 'cause no one wants to go to the Jim Crow state, the modern one where you can't learn what everyone else around you is learning in different states," he said.
SB 1 remains under consideration in the Ohio Senate despite strong opposition. Wednesday's committee vote followed more than eight and a half hours of testimony, with more than 800 pieces of opponent testimony submitted.
get more stories like this via email
According to research from Lumina Foundation, the rate of U.S. high school seniors seeking higher education is on the upswing.
Although Ohio student rates are improving, the numbers show they still rank behind national figures. The foundation's Stronger Nation report showed nearly 55% of American adults aged 25 to 64 have a college degree or industry-recognized certification. Ohio's attainment rate is almost 53%, 12 points shy of the 2025 goal for the state.
Teresa Lubbers, a Lumina Foundation board member and president of the Sagamore Institute, a think tank focusing on social impact issues, said the study was done with a sense of urgency.
"I don't think that the salary alone can be the measure because some important jobs don't have the pay that we think they should have," Lubbers pointed out. "But economic mobility is an important way to measure it, and all degrees and credentials should ensure economic mobility and meet workforce needs."
The report specified a post-high school education as an associate's, bachelor's or master's degree or an industry-recognized certificate. It noted 60% of adults in the United States will need a post-high school credential in training and a demonstrated competency in an employable skill.
Data classified by race and ethnicity showed progress across the board. The report found 31% of Black students either have an associate, bachelor's or master's degree, while 45% of white students, 32% of Hispanic students, and 66% of Asian students have obtained degrees.
Lubbers stressed it is important to compile the information.
"Whether it's college readiness, college completion, dual credit, return on investment, the number of credentials and certificates, all of those things roll up to make the case for what we're doing and what's working," Lubbers outlined.
The report recommended maintaining the current achievement figures and boosting enrollment numbers in credential-based institutions.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Institutions need to do more to close the higher education graduation gap for Native Americans, according to a new report.
The report notes at just 25%, Native Americans have the lowest college-going rate of any racial group in the country.
Cheryl Crazy Bull - the president and CEO of the American Indian College Fund, who helped author the report - recommended states set specific higher education goals, focused on increasing Native participation.
She added that they should prioritize direct engagement with tribes and schools to provide resources, as well as expanding recruitment practices.
"Those practices," said Crazy Bull, "can often exclude Native students who live in reservation rural areas as well as urban Native students."
In 2022, Oregon made public universities free for Native students enrolled in one of the state's nine federally recognized tribes through the Oregon Tribal Stewardship Grant.
The program has been gaining steam over the years - but the graduation gap, made larger during the pandemic, has not closed.
While Crazy Bull said financial barriers play a big part in preventing native people from accessing higher education, she added that not all issues can be solved with money.
"How do institutions create a place or a sense of belonging for students?" said Crazy Bull. "That's just a constant effort."
Crazy Bull added that even before the new administration, anti-DEI practices were harmful to Native students' experiences.
Applications for the next academic year, 2025-26, will open in April.
To qualify for the grant, they must be accepted for enrollment at an Oregon college or university.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email