EAGLE, Colo. - "Just add water." Simple instructions on the back of your muffin mix, but coming up with the Colorado Water Plan dictated by the Governor last year is proving to be much more complicated. Currently, regional meetings are taking place to put together a plan that will work for the entire state, but Eagle County Commissioner Kathy Chandler-Henry said she is concerned about the competing needs of the Front Range and the mountain communities.

"The concern is that the water is on the western slope and the people are on the eastern slope," she pointed out. "While it's always a great idea to collaborate and work together, we always are a little protective of the water that we need to keep on the western slope."

According to the Northwest Council of Governments, people incorrectly make several assumptions about water: that population growth can't be contained, that there's plenty of water on the west slope for the Front Range, and that new water projects are needed to save agricultural interests.

The Colorado Water Plan now in the works is the first of its kind and is to be complete by 2015. It will then influence water decisions for the foreseeable future.

Chandler-Henry and others also question predictions that Colorado's population is going to double by 2050.

"We don't think that's necessarily true," she said. "We've has some big changes with the recession recently that have slowed down population growth, and would like to see more land planning, community planning be a part of this whole water discussion."

Colorado water allocation has historically been guided by local governments. Supporters of Colorado's Water Plan say its goal is to get those communities to work more cohesively and streamline efforts to provide adequate water while not compromising the environment.

Link to more information on the Colorado Water Plan at NWCCOG.org and the relevant executive order at 1.usa.gov/NCQbWD.




get more stories like this via email

A U.S. Supreme Court case that began in Idaho has weakened protections across the nation under the Clean Water Act.

The justices on Thursday handed down a 5-4 decision that will undo federal safeguards for wetlands. The case stems from a couple's attempt to build a house in Priest Lake, Idaho. The Environmental Protection Agency informed the couple that backfilling on the property violated the Clean Water Act because it was affecting sensitive wetland habitat. The couple sued the agency.

Alex Funk, director of water resources and senior counsel for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, said the decision is a blow in many respects, including to people who enjoy the outdoors.

"For the hunting, fishing and sporting, and even kind of the broader outdoor rec community," he said, "these wetlands provide so many public values that are now at significant risk from development and other impacts."

In its decision, the majority wrote that Clean Water Act protections extend only to wetlands "indistinguishable" from larger bodies of water. It could affect up to 90 million acres of wetlands across the country.

Funk said wetlands are vital ecosystems providing benefits that tend to go unrecognized.

"If anything," he said, "this is going to put major setbacks on things like our ability to adapt to climate change, respond to extreme weather events, drought."

He noted that these habitats are essential for clean water, flood mitigation and storing carbon. Wetlands cover 386,000 acres in Idaho, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

For the first time in nearly three years, the widespread drought that has had Iowa in its grip is predicted to end. The latest drought outlook says the tinder-dry weather pattern will lift later this year.

The last time no part of Iowa was abnormally dry was in April 2020, according to the federal Climate Prediction Center's latest seasonal outlook. Justin Glisan, Iowa's state climatologist, said much wetter-than-normal spring weather, including the severe weather events that came with it, will kickstart the state's long climb back from the drought.

"Three years of precipitation deficits stacking up to 25 inches below average," he said. "We've started to put a dent in those longer-term deficits. We're seeing improvement, and contraction of the drought region."

May and June are normally Iowa's wettest months, and Glisan said the precipitation is still "ramping up." He added that this will be good for farmers who are planting crops and can look forward to more moisture than they've had recently.

Parts of Iowa have seen rainfall up to 6 inches above normal recently. Glisan said it's being driven by the El Niño weather pattern that is expected to intensify in the coming weeks. El Niño results from warmer-than-normal Pacific Ocean temperatures near the equator, and causes more rain in the Midwest. That's a positive for farmers, he said, as opposed to the La Niña pattern, which creates drier conditions in the region.

"We're moving in the right direction, trend-wise, in terms of the large-scale atmospheric setup that would support more rainfall during the growing season," he said, "as opposed to those La Nina signals that we had for the last three years."

Ironically, despite the pervasive drought, Iowa corn yield averages in the past two years have been among the state's highest in history.


get more stories like this via email

Arizona environmental-justice advocates are celebrating some big wins passed through the state budget.

One of the provisions, Senate Bill 1689, also known as the Trees for Kids bill, will make $300,000 available to make tree shade a reality for low-income schools across the state.

Vania Guevara, advocacy director for Chispa Arizona, said the efforts will help mitigate extreme heat in communities, while also providing a healthier learning environment for students.

"For me, the revolution starts with our little ones," Guevara emphasized. "I think that if we are able to have the best quality of life for them and sort of create a nurturing, beautiful environment where they can learn, thrive and continue to grow alongside with nature, we are setting our state up for success and I think our future would be in good hands."

Guevara pointed out the funding will be distributed by the Department of Education on a first-come, first-served basis to schools serving 75% or more students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. She acknowledged improving tree coverage is expensive, but hopes the funds can help address some of the inadequacies in the state.

Guevara noted the bill aligns itself with Chispa Arizona's priorities. The group is aiming to increase tree shade canopies and cool corridors in Arizona communities by 20% by 2030 as they say communities of color are "excessively impacted by extreme heat."

Guevara added she is thankful to state Sen. Mitzi Epstein, D-Tempe, who introduced the bill, and to Gov. Katie Hobbs for her commitment to supporting the environment.

"We knew it was going to be hard to pass," Guevara admitted. "When we found out that it made it into the budget because of some of our allies and the governor's Office of Resiliency and their support, we were extremely pleased."

Guevara argued green infrastructure is crucial for overall community health and well-being. She stressed while her group and others are happy about the measure being included in the budget, they will continue to push and work toward more green spaces.Arizona environmental-justice advocates are celebrating some big wins passed through the state budget.

One of the provisions, Senate Bill 1689, also known as the Trees for Kids bill, will make $300,000 available to make tree shade a reality for low-income schools across the state.

Vania Guevara, advocacy director for Chispa Arizona, said the efforts will help mitigate extreme heat in communities, while also providing a healthier learning environment for students.

"For me, the revolution starts with our little ones," Guevara emphasized. "I think that if we are able to have the best quality of life for them and sort of create a nurturing, beautiful environment where they can learn, thrive and continue to grow alongside with nature, we are setting our state up for success and I think our future would be in good hands."

Guevara pointed out the funding will be distributed by the Department of Education on a first-come, first-served basis to schools serving 75% or more students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. She acknowledged improving tree coverage is expensive, but hopes the funds can help address some of the inadequacies in the state.

Guevara noted the bill aligns itself with Chispa Arizona's priorities. The group is aiming to increase tree shade canopies and cool corridors in Arizona communities by 20% by 2030 as they say communities of color are "excessively impacted by extreme heat."

Guevara added she is thankful to state Sen. Mitzi Epstein, D-Tempe, who introduced the bill, and to Gov. Katie Hobbs for her commitment to supporting the environment.

"We knew it was going to be hard to pass," Guevara admitted. "When we found out that it made it into the budget because of some of our allies and the governor's Office of Resiliency and their support, we were extremely pleased."

Guevara argued green infrastructure is crucial for overall community health and well-being. She stressed while her group and others are happy about the measure being included in the budget, they will continue to push and work toward more green spaces.