VA Lawmakers Revisit Medicaid Expansion Debate
Monday, December 29, 2014
RICHMOND, Va. - Although the Republican leadership in the General Assembly is frowning on it, Democrats and the governor are reopening Virginia's debate on expanding Medicaid. One reason it won't go away is because federal money available to close a big gap in Virginia's healthcare coverage would also close a big gap in the state budget.
As Michael Cassidy, president with The Commonwealth Institute puts it, the state is leaving federal money on the table. Funds he says Congress or the other states will gladly spend.
"Virginians are paying all of those taxes in the other parts of the Affordable Care Act," says Cassidy. "Our state lawmakers are just opting not to bring some of that back, drawing down the federal money that's available to cover more Virginians."
Governor Terry McAuliffe's budget plan counts on the more than $200 million in new federal Medicaid funding to close a budget gap of more than $300 million. But expanding Medicaid under Obamacare is very unpopular with much of the Republican majority in the Legislature.
Critics of expansion say they don't want to commit to enlarging a state program and risk having federal funding cut in the future. But supporters point out the state could pass a so-called circuit breaker, withdrawing expansion if the federal money goes away.
Cassidy says even though Congress has been fighting fierce battles over the budget, it's never shown any appetite for cutting Medicaid funds.
"In all of these rounds of federal deficit-reduction talks and agreements we've had," he says. "None of them have monkeyed with the federal match rate for Medicaid expansion."
According to Cassidy, Medicaid has always been better at controlling expenses than private insurance, with much lower overhead and administrative costs. He adds one irony is that expanding Medicaid would save Virginia a lot of money in other parts of the state budget. He points out the uninsured end up using other types of expensive, state-supported care at such places as clinics, hospitals and jails.
"There's a wide array of services that the state currently pays," he says. "If we went ahead and closed the coverage gap, then the state would get very significant state budget savings."
get more stories like this via email
Christmas is a little more than two weeks away, and toy drives around the country are in full swing. A North Dakota organizer shares some things to …
A federal judge in Nevada has dealt three tribal nations a legal setback in their efforts to stop what could be the construction of the country's larg…
Hoosiers could get their holiday trees from any of about 200 tree farms in the state, according to the Indiana Christmas Tree Growers Association…
Reports from the Insurance Commissioner's office and the state Attorney General reveal an analysis of what they call "the true costs of health care" i…
Connecticut lawmakers are reluctant to approve new emission standards that would require 90% cleaner emissions from internal-combustion engines and re…
Another controversial move in Florida's education system is a proposal to drop sociology, the study of social life and the causes and consequences of …
There are at least three victims after a shooting incident that happened at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas campus on Wednesday. By afternoon…
There's a new resource for Nebraska communities and organizations facing environmental justice issues: the Heartland Environmental Justice Center (HEJ…