Newscasts

PNS Daily News - December 11, 2019 


U.S. House to vote on two articles of impeachment; $1.4 trillion in planned oil & gas development said to put the world in a "a bright red level" of climate crisis; anti-protest legislation moving forward in Ohio; "forest farming" moving forward in Appalachia; and someone is putting cowboy hats on pigeons in Nevada.

2020Talks - December 11, 2019 


18 years ago today, China joined the WTO. Now, China's in a trade war with the U.S. Also, House Democrats and the Trump administration made a deal to move forward with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement.

Proposed Rule Should Benefit NV Consumers on Phone Contracts and More

A new proposed rule would restore the rights of consumers in Nevada and the nation to file class-action legal actions if corporations such as telecom companies engage in activities that rip off consumers just a little bit at a time. Credit: Mike Clifford
A new proposed rule would restore the rights of consumers in Nevada and the nation to file class-action legal actions if corporations such as telecom companies engage in activities that rip off consumers just a little bit at a time. Credit: Mike Clifford
October 12, 2015

LAS VEGAS - A measure is pending that should mean better protection for Nevadans when they sign up for monthly contracts on necessities such as mobile phones.

Matthew Sharp, a Reno trial lawyer with the Nevada Justice Association, says the good news in the proposed change from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is that it will restore class-action rights to Nevadans on essential items such as their monthly mobile phone contracts.

"If a telecom company decides to cheat their customers by $10, $5, or $100, there is a mechanism to hold those businesses accountable for Nevadans and that mechanism is a class action," says Sharp.

Sharpe says those contracts routinely require consumers to sign away their right to file a class-action lawsuit, but the measure now before the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would restore those rights.

On the downside, Sharp says the proposal would force consumers into arbitration on an individual basis. He says that could hurt Nevada consumer's ability to obtain compensation from their bank, if, for example, a fraudster was able to steal $2,000 from their account.

"Well, that's a lot of money, but in order to hold the bank accountable, you will be subject to a mandatory arbitration provision," says Sharp. "And to arbitrate that case, you will be paying well over $2,000 just in arbitration fees - so, that's the kind of thing that can impact consumers."

Sharp says two positive benefits of the proposed rules are that they would provide more transparency for consumers and should provide a deterrent effect for companies to obey the law, so they can avoid lawsuits.

Mike Clifford, Public News Service - NV