SEATTLE – What if ownership of the social media website Twitter was turned over to its users?

That question isn't just hypothetical anymore. Shareholders at this year's annual meeting will vote whether to commission a study on what cooperative ownership would look like for the technology company.

Nathan Schneider, a media studies scholar-in-residence at the University of Colorado-Boulder, proposed the idea in the Guardian last fall after rumors swirled that Twitter was up for sale.

Schneider says he's been involved for a few years now in a movement called “platform cooperativism.”

"An effort to bring the cooperative business model into the online economy as a way of dealing with some of the abuses in terms of labor and surveillance and this sort of thing,” he explains. “And it just seemed like Twitter is an interesting case for that."

The vote on whether to commission the study on a Twitter co-op will come sometime before May 22. Schneider notes that the proposal isn't likely to pass, but says the goal is simply to keep the conversation going.

Opponents to the proposal argue that users could be more involved in decisions simply by buying stock, giving them a vote at meetings.

In fact, the Buy Twitter campaign encouraged users to buy stock so they could vote on the proposal. But Schneider says that misses the point.

"The way that a publicly traded corporation is set up – legally as well as culturally – and the way a stock market operates, it really orients participants to focus on the short-term value of the stocks that they own," he explains.

Schneider says successful co-ops span many industries, and include Washington-state-based clothing retailer REI, the Associated Press and the Green Bay Packers football team.

He also says the movement toward cooperative business models is something that is catching on among tech companies.

"This is a kind of model that we think can unlock a lot of value that the really investor-driven tech economy that we've had so far is not unlocking and that it can create some new potential in a huge variety of sectors," he states.





get more stories like this via email

Fraud prevention experts are getting the word out in Idaho on how to avoid scams.

Events across the state in October aim to help people identify and protect themselves from thieves.

Cathy McDougall, director of outreach for AARP Idaho, said if you suspect someone of a con, it is best not to engage with them.

"It's better to be rude and hang up than be robbed from them," McDougall recommended. "Don't respond to suspicious emails from people that you did not initiate contact."

AARP Idaho is hosting an event alongside the Idaho Department of Finance and Idaho Commission on Aging. The first is in Twin Falls on Tuesday. Fraud prevention events will be in Idaho Falls on Wednesday, Coeur d'Alene on Friday and Garden City on Oct. 30.

McDougall noted cons have been around for a long time because they work. She pointed out one scam prevalent in Idaho is the romance scam. McDougall advised people not to send their money to suspicious places or people.

"That's always a red flag," McDougall cautioned. "If you're thinking you're in a relationship with someone and they're asking for you to invest in a cryptocurrency website."

McDougall added if someone is scammed, it is important to report it as quickly as possible.

"There's a very small window of time that law enforcement can actually take steps to try to recover your money," McDougall stressed. "Because after usually around 48 hours, they're just going to be gone."

In response to a growing medical debt crisis in Wyoming and across the nation, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed banning medical debt from credit reports.

Mona Shah, senior director of policy and strategy for the advocacy organization Community Catalyst, said they have heard from countless individuals who were not able to qualify for an apartment, or a car loan, or a job, just because of a bad credit score linked to an unplanned medical event.

"No one plans on taking on medical debt," Shah noted. "A lot of people with medical debt actually are insured, but a lot of the services they need may not be fully covered. And that's how people end up with medical debt."

The United States has the most expensive health care in the world, and currently 41% of adults, about 100 million Americans, carry medical or dental debt. Some hospitals and the debt-collection industry have warned the bureau's move could force providers to require payment up front, and could allow consumers to take on loans they cannot afford or pay back.

Others argued employers, landlords and banks need to know about medical debt as they calculate their risks. But Shah pointed to a recent report from the bureau, which showed medical debt is significantly less predictive of a patient's likelihood of making rent and paying back loans than other forms of debt.

"The other important thing to mention when talking about medical debt is that there is a significant amount of hospital billing errors," Shah emphasized. "In one study, 80% of hospital bills had some sort of error to them."

Shah's group is also pushing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to prohibit the use of deferred-interest credit cards -- which medical providers offer to patients as a way to ensure they get paid -- and do not currently count as medical debt.

"They are very misleading, because they tell individuals that it's 0%, but that interest rate is only for a certain promotional period," Shah stressed. "After that promotional period ends, it's as high as 27%. And that interest will apply retroactively."

The 100 million Americans currently carrying medical or dental debt could get some relief, after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took steps to prohibit credit agencies from including that debt on credit reports.

As Julia Char Gilbert - Connelly policy advocate with the Colorado Center on Law and Policy - explained, bad credit scores due to medical debt can create big problems.

"Families are increasingly facing barriers to accessing rental housing, a credit card, certain forms of employment," said Gilbert, "all because that medical bill is showing up on their credit report."

The CFPB proposal begins a rule-making process that will include a call for public comments.

Gilbert said 700,000 Coloradans currently saddled with medical debt should see relief sooner. A new Colorado law bans medical debt from Coloradans' credit reports.

Critics of the move have argued that employers, landlords and banks need this information as they calculate their risks.

Proponents say excluding medical debt from reports makes the system more fair, since low-income people and people of color are disproportionately burdened by medical bills.

Gilbert also pointed to one CFPB study of five million credit records - showing that medical debt is not a good predictor of whether or not someone can make rent or repay loans.

"And so this change to how we do credit reporting in the United States helps make our credit reporting system more accurate," said Gilbert, "and better at doing what it's intended to do - which is understanding whether a consumer is a good person to extend a loan to."

Under the new Colorado law, Gilbert said it's up to credit agencies to make sure medical debt is not listed on your credit report.

But she said if you have an important life event coming up - applying for a job, apartment, credit card or loan - it's worth double checking.

"If your medical debt is still showing up on your credit report, and you're a resident of Colorado, that shouldn't be happening under the new law," said Gilbert. "And you have the right to file what's called a dispute, and make sure that that information gets cleaned up."




get more stories like this via email