SEATTLE -- The natural gas industry has launched a major campaign in the Northwest to tout the fuel source as a reliable way to fight climate change.

Environmental groups say it's as harmful as other dirty sources for the planet.

The Partnership for Energy Progress, made up energy companies and unions, is launching a $2.8 million campaign this year to promote natural gas as the energy source of the future.

Ingrid Archibald, safe cities field organizer for the group Stand.Earth contended even the word "natural" is misleading, since three-quarters of the fuel comes from fracking, nationwide.

"Burning gas is just as natural as burning any other fossil fuels," Archibald said. "And just because it comes from the earth doesn't mean that doing so is a good thing or that it's sustainable or good for our communities or for the environment."

The group pushing natural gas, the Partnership for Energy Progress, said natural gas is necessary to transition from coal to renewable sources like wind and solar.

The Partnership for Energy Progress includes the United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters and energy companies Puget Sound Energy and TC Energy, which is behind the Keystone XL pipeline.

Jesse Piedfort, director of the Washington state chapter of Sierra Club, noted the fuel often leaks methane, a greenhouse gas 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide over its first 20 years in the atmosphere.

He said we'll have to move away from natural gas if we want to stop climate change.

"They have a lot of money on their side and we have the science on our side," Piedfort said. "We know what the climate models show. We know what the truth is. We know where we have to start going on energy and natural gas."

The Partnership for Energy Progress has gone on the offensive in places like Bellingham, where the city is considering phasing out natural gas and electrifying homes instead.

Other cities are looking at the building sector as well, which is the fastest growing source of climate pollution in Washington state and up 50% since 1990.

Archibald said the natural gas industry understands the stakes.

"They know that electrification is a huge threat to their bottom line and their plan to frack and burn gas for as long as they can," Archibald said. "And we're calling that out and saying, 'We can't do that anymore. We need to stop burning gas. We need to move on to clean and renewable energy as quickly as we can.'"

The Partnership for Energy Progress notes natural gas is a cheaper form of fuel.

But Archibald doesn't believe the industry evaluates the full cost of gas, including its impacts on indoor air quality.

UPDATE: In statement from the Partnership for Energy Progress, the group said it will, "play a leadership role in communicating our progress toward advancing renewable energy and addressing climate change." It added that the industry captures organic methane that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere and converts it to energy.

A Senate committee will decide whether to advance House Bill 1007, which, if passed, would allow Indiana utilities to recover costs for small modular nuclear reactors before obtaining permits.

The bill also includes a 20% tax credit for reactor manufacturers. Supporters said it will lower long-term energy costs and improve reliability, while opponents warned it could raise consumer bills.

Robyn Skyua-Boss, Hoosier Chapter director for the Sierra Club, said the bill shifts financial risk to utility customers.

"Hoosier customers could see their bills going up to subsidize and cover the costs of building out these extremely expensive small modular nuclear reactors," Skyua-Boss pointed out. "As well as we could see costs going up because of the provisions in the bill that could delay coal plant retirements."

No small modular nuclear reactors currently operate in the U.S., and past projects have faced cost overruns and cancellations. Opponents cited Indiana's abandoned Marble Hill nuclear plant, which left consumers paying for an incomplete facility.

Skyua-Boss argued the bill could slow Indiana's transition to renewable energy.

"We really want to see more engagement from our state leaders," Skyua-Boss urged. "We want to see community solar legislation advance. Unfortunately, the bills around community solar did not advance this session; instead, we're here talking about House Bill 1007."

Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, the bill's author, said it positions Indiana as an energy leader while balancing cost and sustainability. The bill now moves to a Senate committee.

Clean-energy advocates in Texas are closely monitoring a bill before the Legislature that, if passed, could stop the development and operation of additional projects.

The state has experienced a huge increase in wind and solar energy use.

A recent study shows that Texas ranks first in the nation for wind power generation, second for solar power generation, and is second in the nation for battery storage.

Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said they're hosting a meeting tonight to better explain Senate Bill 819 - which could hinder further expansion.

"Our webinar seeks to educate the public about some of these attacks on clean energy," said Metzger, "reminding people how critical they are for our environment, for public health, as well as working to bust some of the myths out there about renewables."

A similar bill passed in the Texas Senate during the last legislative session but didn't make it through the House of Representatives.

The webinar starts at 6 o'clock. Viewers can register on the Environment Texas website.

The demand for electricity in the State is projected to double over the next five years.

Problems with the Texas grid have more people turning to clean energy to cool and heat their homes and businesses.

Metzger said it's estimated that Texans save $1 billion each month because of wind and solar.

"As renewables have grown - as of just last year producing almost one third of the electricity in the state of Texas," said Metzger, "we're starting to see some pushback from fossil-fuel companies and others that are threatened by the growth in clean energy."

He said Senate Bill 819 includes discriminatory permitting requirements, setbacks for wind and solar facilities, and new taxes and fees targeting renewable energy.





get more stories like this via email

In Wyoming, electric utility PacifiCorp's draft 2025 plans show a shift away from renewable energy additions compared with last year, according to a new report.

Final plans are expected later this month, following industry wins during the state's legislative session. One new law passed by the Wyoming Legislature decreased the severance tax rate for surface coal from 6.5% to 6%, saving the industry about $10 million annually. A second creates a new fund, also $10 million, to support companies pumping carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, into the ground in order to increase oil production.

Emma Jones, climate and energy organizer for the Wyoming chapter of the Sierra Club, said the moves are pushing the state in the wrong direction.

"What it's doing is providing an incentive for fossil fuel industries to continue to produce carbon dioxide," Jones pointed out. "What we've seen is that it's not increasing the number of jobs available for people and it's not making energy cheaper."

Jones added in Wyoming, tax breaks and extra funding to fossil fuel companies come at a cost to state beneficiaries, such as education and public services. According to the report, in 2023, the state's electricity generation profile consisted of about 71% coal-fired power plants, 21% wind and the rest was a mix.

Jones noted state officials fret Wyoming is becoming a "retirement community." She emphasized over roughly the past decade, the state ranked second lowest in the U.S. for job growth, at just 1% compared with the national average of nearly 14%.

"Our most important export today is not coal or natural gas, but jobs," Jones contended. "Skilled laborers, educated young people who are leaving the state for better opportunities elsewhere."

In its 2023 plan, PacifiCorp calculated two outlooks, one with high renewables and one with low. It projected higher renewables would mean about 10,000 more jobs than the alternative.