BISMARCK, N.D. -- Over the coming weeks, North Dakotans will be clicking the "purchase" button as they order holiday gifts online, and fraud experts say scammers are finding ways to exploit consumers.
Amy Nofziger, director of fraud victim support for AARP, urged the public to avoid abrupt transactions done with little research, adding fake social-media ads are a big concern this year.
She said as people quickly scroll through online ads, they might not do enough vetting to make sure the company behind a post is real. She added supply chain issues could prompt people to bypass trusted companies through internet searches.
"And they're finding these websites that look legitimate, but they're not," Nofziger observed. "Take the name of the company, put it in a search engine, and do your research. "
When entering the unknown company's name, she suggested typing the words review, scam and complaints to see what pops up. Another common scam right now is getting a message disguised as a warning from well-known delivery companies, indicating something went wrong with a shipment to your address. Experts pointed out the messages often include harmful links.
Parrell Grossman, director of the consumer protection and antitrust division for the North Dakota Attorney General's Office, said they continue to field calls for a variety of scams, including online romance situations where someone loses their money to the person they connected with.
He worries people might be more vulnerable to those scenarios right now.
"When you're lonely at the holidays, it might be the time you decide to engage with someone over the internet," Grossman remarked. "And they can be very convincing, and they will have a myriad of reasons why they need money."
Nofziger emphasized you should never feel ashamed about falling victim to a scam, and taking immediate action is the best approach.
"These are good criminals that are targeting you to steal your money," Nofziger cautioned. "You should be mad, you should be empowered to report it."
Disclosure: AARP North Dakota contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Super Bowl LVII is right around the corner, which means Arizona will see hefty spending and wide exposure because of the massive sporting event.
Danny Seiden, president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said the last time Arizona hosted the Super Bowl in 2015, it generated nearly $720 million for the state economy, attracted more than 120,000 out-of-state visitors just for the game and had more than 114 million viewers looking at Arizona.
Seiden noted it is a great showcase and economic driver for the state.
"The excitement for this Super Bowl is high," Seiden pointed out. "The excitement to come to a warm state like Arizona in February where you are going to see some sunshine is big, especially coupled with the Phoenix Open and everything else going on. So, I mean, I think we could see closer to $1 billion."
The Waste Management Phoenix Open will also be taking place Feb. 6-12. Seiden explained the mega events have a huge impact on the hospitality sector and called it a "huge boost of adrenaline" for local mom-and-pop shops disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Seiden projects more than a million people are going to come through the state for the various mega events happening in February. He emphasized Arizona is a state which values and fosters meritocracy, and noted during the last Super Bowl, Apple was one of the big companies to establish roots in the state, and has grown its presence since then.
"We have over 70 CEOs right now signed up for CEO forums who are looking at Arizona for relocation and expansion of their company," Seiden reported. "That's all fantastic news, and those impacts go on far past just the Super Bowl week and Super Bowl year."
Seiden stressed now through March is an exciting time to be in Arizona. After the Waste Management Open, he added baseball spring training is expected to bring more than $600 million in economic impact.
get more stories like this via email
A South Dakota legislative committee has begun discussions on a plan to repeal the state's grocery tax.
It has been a politically divisive issue amid calls to help residents still reeling from inflation. Nearly a dozen states impose sales taxes on food sold in supermarkets. Some have taken steps to pause or reduce taxes after major spikes in consumer prices.
Erik Nelson, associate state director of advocacy for AARP South Dakota, said the state should take similar action by eliminating its grocery tax. He pointed out there are many people out there, including older residents, who are still feeling the squeeze.
"Many times, South Dakota's low-income seniors may be having to choose between purchasing food and other vital necessities such as prescription drugs or heat," Nelson observed.
Republican Gov. Kristi Noem also supports the idea, but some members of her party plan to oppose the move when it comes up for votes. They, along with groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, argued the move could place pressure on the state budget because a key revenue source would be lost.
But Nelson suggested lawmakers need to take the long view, noting not being able to shop for enough food could be detrimental to the health outcomes of older South Dakotans.
"Seniors that have difficulty accessing and maintaining an adequate and nutritious diet," Nelson emphasized. "We of course recognize that access to healthy food is important to keeping us healthy."
South Dakota's tax on groceries is 4.5%. It is one of only three states to tax groceries at the full sales-tax rate. While concerns about the impact on revenue have been raised, Noem argued the state would still have enough available money in the general fund.
Disclosure: AARP South Dakota contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The health risks associated with gas-burning stoves have caused a recent stir and fears of a government ban on the appliances, but a Michigan lawmaker said it would be going too far.
Gas stoves are known to emit nitrogen dioxide, and without proper ventilation, studies have shown indoor air pollution can worsen, causing respiratory illnesses.
A recent study found 13% of childhood asthma cases are attributable to gas stove emissions.
Dr. John Levy, professor and chair of the Department of Environmental Health at Boston University, said the structure of a home can determine the risks.
"For many people, things like gas stoves could actually be their highest source of air pollution exposure," Levy pointed out. "That itself is important."
Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., said a prohibition on gas appliances would prevent Americans from choosing the oven which works best for them. His bill, The S.T.O.V.E. Act, or "Stop Trying to Obsessively Vilify Energy," would bar the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission from banning gas stoves.
Natural gas is used in more than a third of homes nationwide, but not every household can easily swap out their appliances, especially renters and low-income households, where the majority of asthmatic children live.
Levy pointed out studies have shown improved ventilation in these homes pays for itself when it comes to asthma-related health care costs.
"If we're thinking about folks who maybe are on Medicaid, this actually could be a wise government investment to try to reduce health care costs and health burdens," Levy contended.
The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in 2022, offers homeowners tax incentives for swapping out gas stoves for electric induction versions, as well as other energy-efficient appliances.
Levy added he would like to see a renewed focus on gas stoves to improve building codes, especially in low-income housing and disadvantaged neighborhoods.
get more stories like this via email