As more self-driving cars come online, some lawmakers in Olympia want to make sure they follow the rules of the road.
House Bill 1731 would strengthen requirements for autonomous-vehicle testing in Washington state. Sponsor of the bill state Rep. Shelley Kloba - D-Kirkland - said the Washington State Autonomous Vehicle Work Group discovered there was a low bar required to start testing these vehicles.
"There was no difference, basically," said Kloba, "in what you had to do or prove or show or what kind of criteria you had to meet in order to drive without a human in the car. Nothing. There was no difference, and I think that was kind of concerning."
HB 1731 would strengthen these standards, as well as ensuring that relevant information goes out to first responders in the event of an accident and that data on testing is accessible to the public.
Opponents from the autonomous-vehicle industry say these are onerous standards not required in any other state. Industry groups are instead backing House Bill 2100, a similar measure with fewer requirements for sending data.
Recent data from the U.S. Department of Transportation finds the first nine months of 2021 were the deadliest on the road since 2006.
Larry Shannon is the government affairs director for the Washington State Association for Justice, and supports HB 1731. He said while driverless technology has potential, it still has a long way to go - noting that vehicles struggle to perceive animals and pedestrians or recognize weather patterns.
"It's a promise that's being made to the public," said Shannon, "that we will have these vehicles that can operate safely and in our current and future driving environments, more safely than human drivers. Given the questions around the current capabilities of this technology, the safeguards need to be in place and need to remain in place that are in this bill."
There have been several deaths involving self-driving cars, including an Arizona pedestrian in 2018.
Shannon said every combination of car technology will be sharing the road as we move toward more autonomous vehicles.
"We need to keep that in mind as we think about how we're going to control and regulate and integrate the different vehicles moving forward," said Shannon.
Both HB 1731 and HB 2100 are in the House Committee on Transportation.
Disclosure: Washington State Association for Justice contributes to our fund for reporting on Consumer Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Air travelers could face fewer obstacles in securing a refund if their flight is canceled or changed under new federal rules announced Wednesday.
The moves are being praised by watchdog groups. The Department of Transportation said airlines are now required to promptly provide passengers with automatic cash refunds when they are owed one.
Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog director for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, said some carriers have not adhered to standards, leaving passengers in a bind.
"They would drag their feet, and they would say, 'Well, you bought your ticket from a ticket agent, so we don't know where your money is. Or, here, have a voucher,'" Murray explained.
Amid higher complaint volumes, companies will be forced to act quickly. The new rules, which are being phased in, provide clearer definitions for travel disruptions, including delays of at least three hours on a domestic flight and six hours on international flights. A key industry group responded to the announcement by touting transparency efforts among carriers.
Murray acknowledged most people are not frequent flyers, and it is hard for them to keep up on all the least practices and policies among airlines.
"The average person only flies once every 18 months," Murray pointed out. "This will just bring transparency to that process and it kind of evens the playing field."
Murray added it could come in handy for Midwestern customers when a winter storm wreaks havoc on air travel. The new rules also require refunds for baggage fees when a piece of luggage is delayed by 12 hours or more for domestic flights. And there must be upfront disclosure on fees for first and second checked bags and carry-on bags.
get more stories like this via email
Wisconsin lawmakers recently debated reforms for payday loans. Efforts to protect consumers come amid new research about financial pain associated with cash advances offered through smartphone apps. The Center for Responsible Lending is out with findings that detail how "earned wage advances" from digital platforms come with extra costs disguised as things like tips. Traditional payday lenders are often criticized for charging excessive interest rates on loans that are usually around $500.
Lucia Constantine, a researcher with the Center for Responsible Lending, said customers are usually seeking smaller amounts from the apps, but she warns they can be just as costly.
"They are trapping consumers in a cycle of borrowing that is similar to that of a payday loan, " she said.
The report said after using these financial products, customers are seeing overdrafts on their checking accounts increase by 56% on average. Industry leaders deny they're barraging consumers with hidden fees, stressing that features such as suggested tips are optional. More broadly, a bipartisan payday loan reform bill in the Wisconsin Legislature failed to advance this month.
Constantine said like longstanding payday lenders, these cash advance apps can be hard to regulate. Meanwhile, she urged those in a bind to explore other options.
"[They should] try talking to their friends and family as a first source. The other option which I would recommend is reaching out to their credit union or banking institution to see if they can get some sort of small-dollar loan," she said.
She noted places such as credit unions typically provide more transparency on loan costs. According to the report, three-quarters of consumers took out at least one advance on the same day or day after a re-payment was posted.
get more stories like this via email
Food prices remain high, in Montana and across the country.
A new report by the Federal Trade Commission says the country's largest grocery companies are gouging consumers, by keeping prices artificially high.
Many grocers, retailers and wholesalers have consolidated to cut costs. Grocers continue to blame supply chain problems, even though regulators have said most of those issues have been resolved.
President of the advocacy group Farm Action, Angela Huffman, said retailers were doing more than making up for lost revenue during the pandemic-era supply chain disruptions - and the FTC report says they continue to do so.
"In 2021, the retailer revenues, they rose to more than 6% higher than their total costs, and that those profits are still going up," said Huffman. "So, in the first nine months of 2023, the profits increased to 7%."
At nearly 6.5%, Montana had the nation's ninth-highest grocery price increase in 2023.
The FTC data show Amazon, Kroger and WalMart each gained market share during and after the pandemic - while profits continued to rise.
Other large retailers and wholesalers have consolidated, which they say gives them more buying power and the ability to pass those savings on to customers.
Huffman said that isn't what's happening, and calls on regulators to fine the grocers, or more.
"This would be kind of the farthest extent of what they could do, but go so far as breaking them up," said Huffman. "In years past, they broke up the telephone companies and the railroads and, you know, that would be the ideal outcome for us, is to take away their excessive power."
Huffman also points to a 150% increase in egg prices in 2023, which producers blamed on the avian flu. The FTC says the disease did not justify the drastic price hike.
get more stories like this via email