SCOTUS to Hear Constitutional Challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act
Tuesday, October 25, 2022
A case before the U.S. Supreme Court has Native Americans in Utah and other states concerned the outcome could revive the centuries-old practice of separating indigenous children from their families.
The court will decide the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act. The 1978 law ended the practice of forcibly placing native children in nonnative homes or in "Indian boarding schools" to assimilate them into white culture.
Dozens of tribes and ACLU chapters have filed briefs, urging the high court to uphold the Act.
Heather Tanana, assistant professor of law at the University of Utah, said many families who adopted native children believed they were saving them from growing up "uncivilized."
"They would take kids away on this assumption that the environment they were growing up in was unsafe," Tanana explained. "To the contrary, this connection to your family, to your tradition and culture has positive health and mental health outcomes."
The plaintiffs, a Texas family blocked from adopting a native child, claim the law unfairly bestows rights on tribal nations not provided to other racial minorities. Indigenous leaders fear a reversal could significantly change the way the federal government deals with tribal nations on major issues.
Tanana is a citizen of the Navajo Nation who said the Act establishes a legal preference that native children who are removed from their homes must first be placed with extended family members or in native foster homes. She said some state legislatures have begun extending protections for native families.
"Many states are proceeding with having their own state ICWA statutes," Tanana pointed out. "In fact, Utah is in the process of putting together its ICWA statute. Many of them incorporate federal provisions, and then other states even go a step beyond and have more protections."
Tanana added the case turns on whether treating native tribes as sovereign nations is a violation of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection.
The federal government has always recognized tribes as sovereign nations, thus the political distinction. They interact with tribes on a government-to-government basis, and they do not do so with any other racial group.
get more stories like this via email
Congress has signed off on a bill that preserves federal protections for same-sex and interracial marriages. A legal expert in Wisconsin says it …
Airport service workers rallied in Washington, D.C., Thursday to demand Congress pass legislation ensuring they receive a livable wage with stronger …
Before the pandemic, one in five people in Los Angeles County lacked consistent access to food - and in 2021, one in four low-income families …
Electric vehicles are an environmentally friendly way to get from one place to another, but the lack of charging stations often limits drivers to …
As Americans make end-of-year donations to their favorite causes, those that help children with cancer and their families say these households need …
A labor union representing agricultural workers in Ohio, North Carolina and Virginia says it isn't waiting around for federal immigration reform to …
West Virginia's prison population has ballooned, and formerly incarcerated people face numerous obstacles when they are released. A Charleston-based …
As the year comes to a close, the Sierra Club of Connecticut is looking back on some of its accomplishments and challenges. The group focuses on …