In honor of National Honey Bee Day, New York environmentalists want Gov. Hochul to sign the Birds and Bees Protection Act.

The bill prohibits selling neonicotinoids and use of seeds coated with the pesticides. It also requires the state's Department of Environmental Conservation to review the latest science concerning active ingredients in them. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finds neonicotinoids can jeopardize more than 200 plant and animal species protected by the Endangered Species Act.

Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, D-Manhattan, the bill's Senate sponsor, described effects the pesticides can have.

"In addition to driving down the population of critical pollinators like bees as we celebrate International Honey Bee Day, neonicotinoids are linked to a host of health problems in humans, including neurological damage, and birth defects," Hoylman-Sigal pointed out.

In humans, neonicotinoids are linked to altered insulin regulation, and lower testosterone levels.

The Legislature approved the bill last year, though Gov. Hochul vetoed it, citing the Department of Environmental Conservation's current regulatory role and its stringent pesticide program.

The Environmental Protection Agency made interim decisions on the chemicals, such as restricting when pesticides can be applied to blooming crops to limit exposure to bees.

Corinne Hansch, owner of Lovin' Mama Farms, said the pesticides are not as beneficial as pollinators are.

"Corn and wheat grown from neonic coated seeds cause near instant death to any insect who touches these plants, and we are seeing dangerous levels of insect die off," Hansch emphasized. "Farmers like me, we rely upon insects, i.e. pollinators, for our fruiting crops and our seed crops, plus we rely upon beneficial insects for pest control."

A study in the journal Nature found exposure to neonicotinoids reduced a honeybee's ability to survive in winter. Between 2020 and 2021, beekeepers across the U.S. saw 45% of their colonies die off.

Connecticut's General Assembly considered a similar bill this year, but it wasn't approved.

Bipartisan legislation that proposes the installation of solar panels in schools across Pennsylvania awaits a vote in the state Senate.

The Solar for Schools bill aims to combat climate change and invest in education. Fewer than 2% of Pennsylvania's nearly 7,000 schools are powered by solar energy.

Mick Iskric is superintendent of Steelton-Highspire School District, which has a 42-acre urban school campus that serves more than 1,300 students from low-income families. He explained that, after partnering with McClure Company to install solar panels, the district now sees a monthly credit on its electric bill.

Iskric is convinced the legislation would be a game-changer for school districts in the Commonwealth.

"And then ultimately, all that savings, what we're trying to do is get more funding to offset our expenses and get more programming for students," Iskric said. "So, the more money I save, the more support I can get directly into the classroom."

According to Iskric, the district has achieved 100% reliance on solar power for its electricity, and will save an estimated $1.6 million over the next 20 years.

In the meantime, the Inflation Reduction Act offers access to clean-energy tax credits, with an emphasis on reaching disadvantaged populations and communities with environmental-justice concerns.

Iskric also noted the district has recently received seven electric school buses through the EPA's Clean School Bus Grant Program, which will be in the fleet for the 2024-2025 school year. He asserted that Steelton-Highspire is the only district in the country which transports students with 100% electric buses, charged with solar energy.

"We're looking to expand if this bill comes through," he posited, "and I'd really love for some community solar to come through along with it or down the road, so that homeowners can offset their electric bills -- really try to tie the school to the community, community to the school."

Iskric also suggested a prospective plan to assist teachers in the region by offering free electric car charging for district employees, and implementing other incentives to attract new talent. He acknowledged that, while innovation is a driving force behind these initiatives, it is also a necessity to address staffing challenges.

The Pennsylvania State Senate is set to reconvene Dec. 11.

This story was based on original reporting by Audrey Carleton for Capital & Main.

Scientists in rural New England are working to better monitor and manage tick populations as climate change helps fuel their dramatic increase.

Cases of tick-borne illnesses have skyrocketed in the region, while new tick species have expanded their range further north, posing risks to both humans and wildlife.

University of New Hampshire Clinical Associate Professor David Needle said scientists will collaborate on data collection as well as education and public outreach on how to stay safe.

"General thought is," said Needle, "the number of cases and impacts from tick-borne diseases are grossly underestimated by what we actually see and what's been tested."

Needle said the data collected could also serve as a warning system for farmers and vets to better protect livestock by knowing when to utilize protective chemicals, potentially saving not only the animals lives but preventing financial losses for rural communities.

Increasingly mild winters in New England have helped ticks to thrive at a time when they are normally dormant. And that is altering the regional ecosystem - causing a dramatic die-off of moose calves, for example.

Needle said as tick populations increase, scientists need to better understand their patterns and where diseases could emerge next in both wildlife and humans.

"At the very least," said Needle, "we're going to be generating data and real information about where pathogens are and where ticks are and the data will hopefully provide opportunity for intervention at the public health level."

The two-year project involves scientists with the Universities of Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. Needle said he hopes the data can provide a baseline for scientists to follow in the future.





get more stories like this via email

Indiana is losing wetlands even as the state has made some effort to protect them. Wetlands provide wildlife habitat, purify and recharge groundwater for drinking, and reduce flood risks by storing water. However, Indiana has lost up to 90% of its wetlands. The legislature provided some protection for the rest in 2021, but last year, a special task force found that shrinking wetlands are having significant negative effects on the environment.

Indra Frank, director of environmental health and water policy at the Hoosier Environmental Council says lawmakers should be doing more.

"Now we have data showing that our state's wetlands law is not doing much in the way of protection. So, the Indiana General Assembly certainly could make changes," Frank said. "They could also make changes to provide incentives for landowners who preserve or who restore wetlands."

Indiana has about 800,000 wetland acres, down from more than 5 million 200 years ago - and has no statewide plan to manage them. A poll by the Audubon Society

found more than half the people surveyed in Indiana said they would prioritize protecting water sources and habitats over landowners' and developers' rights.

Frank contends another governing body of 'tossing the ball' rather than protecting wetlands. This spring, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling restricted which bodies of water can be protected under the federal Clean Water Act. She said the decision dropped the amount of Indiana wetlands with federal protection from 80%, to 20%.

"Now we're in a position where Indiana's remaining wetlands have very little federal protection and very little state protection," Frank continued. "The Supreme Court's decision basically said that the fate of the wetlands is up to the states."

Since then, attempts have been made in the Indiana General Assembly to make wetlands protection even harder. But the Audubon Society poll also found almost 75% of residents surveyed would have a "less favorable" impression of a state lawmaker who voted to relax wetland protections.


get more stories like this via email