Two years ago today, a teenager killed 19 students and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde. The families of those shot and killed have agreed to a $2 million settlement with the city, which equals the entire amount of the town's insurance policy.

Attorneys for the group say they worked with city officials for more than a year after leaders reached out and asked what could be done to ease the families' pain.

Javier Cazares, who lost his daughter in the shooting, said justice and accountability are his main concerns.

"It's been an unbearable two years," he said. "We all know who took our children's lives, but there was an obvious failure out there on May 24. The whole world saw that. We've been let down so many times. The time has come to do the right thing."

The mass shooting garnered international attention and questions after 376 law-enforcement officers waited 77 minutes before going into the classroom to stop the shooter. Family members are disappointed that no disciplinary action has been taken against any of the officers involved, although Uvalde Police Chief Daniel Rodriguez resigned amid questions over how the incident was handled.

In addition to the $2 million settlement, the city of Uvalde has agreed to "restorative justice" policy changes that include establishing an annual day of remembrance on May 24, mental-health services for all families in the community, and addressing public safety risks and the burden of gun violence on police officers.

Although families have settled with the city, said attorney Josh Koskoff, they are filing additional lawsuits including one against the state of Texas, "which has done nothing but burden this town before the shooting by not giving them the resources they need, preventing these families from getting the information they need, and then blaming the city, as if they didn't have how many police officers there? 98? As if they didn't know how to shoot somebody."


get more stories like this via email

If two Michigan lawmakers have their way, there will be fewer locations in the state where people are allowed to carry firearms.

State Sen. Dayna Polehanki, D-Livonia, and state Sen. Rosemary Bayer, D-Beverly Hills, have introduced bills that would expand gun-free zones within the State Capitol complex.

Both have advocated for stricter gun laws in Michigan.

Senate Bills 857 and 858 would make it illegal to carry a firearm in the State Capitol building, the Binsfeld Senate Office Building, and the Anderson House Office Building - with an exception for legislators.

Ryan Bates, executive director of the group End Gun Violence Michigan, said he believes these proposals are much needed.

"We cannot have a functioning democracy at the barrel of a gun," said Bates. "So, it's incredibly important that we protect our legislators and protect our democracy from people who want to do it harm by bringing guns into the places where our laws are made."

If the gun-free zone bills become law, violators could face up to 90 days in jail, and or be fined.

During the highly publicized Oxford High School shooter trial, Polehanki took to social media to warn parents that if their child discharges a firearm and causes harm to themselves or others, the parent is going to jail.

Longtime firearms instructor and gun-rights advocate Rick Ector said he's all for responsible gun ownership - but not gun-free zones.

He argued that having law-abiding citizens carrying firearms in more places would inherently make these areas safer.

"People who have a concealed pistol license, who are primarily the people we're talking about," said Ector, "they are statistically more law-abiding than the law enforcement community, and they've gone through all the required, statutorily specified training."

Both bills have been assigned to the Senate Committee on Civil Rights, Judiciary and Public Safety.




get more stories like this via email

Firearm-related injuries in Colorado hit a peak in 2022, with over 7,000 health care claims and at a cost of $8.4 million, according to a new analysis by the Center for Improving Value in Health Care.

Cari Frank, vice president for communications with the center, said nearly nine in ten gun-related injury claims were for adults.

But she said there were alarming spikes in the rate of these injuries among children.

"For children and youth, the rate of firearm injury claims was the highest percent increase," said Frank. "It increased 120%. Which says that unfortunately kids are tending to unintentionally harm themselves as a result of firearms."

Data from the Colorado All Payer Claims Database showed that unintentional injuries were the most common type of firearm injuries across all age groups, and in both rural and metropolitan areas.

But Frank noted that those injuries rose the most among children, up by 143% between 2016 and 2022.

Men had significantly more gun injury claims than women, with rates four times higher for unintentional injuries, three times higher for assault, and two-and-a-half times higher for self-harm.

But Frank said women also saw increases in gun injuries.

"Even though men tend to have more firearm-related injuries," said Frank, "females have seen a spike with the percentages really increasing for the undetermined intent, and then also assault was the second highest spike for women."

Frank said she hopes policy makers, and voters, will find the data useful in measuring the impact of work currently being done to address firearm violence and deaths.

Frank said she believes continued focus on education and community-tailored prevention programs is critical.

"Through either education," said Frank, "or gun safety programs that can prevent these types of firearm injuries that are happening across the state more and more."

The New Hampshire Senate will vote this week on a bipartisan gun violence prevention bill prompted by last year's deadly shooting at New Hampshire Hospital.

The bill would allow the state to report individuals with involuntary mental health admissions and other prohibited buyers to the federal background checks system, known as "NICS."

Sen. Debra Altschiller, D-Stratham, called it a historic moment to close a legal loophole and protect public safety.

"We have people who are a danger to themselves and others around them and struggling with severe mental health issues, who have access to firearms because we have zero stopgaps," Altschiller observed.

Altschiller pointed out even the gun lobby has backed similar measures in other states but some Senate Republicans have portrayed the bill as a "gun grab" and say the focus should be on improving mental health services.

New Hampshire Hospital security guard and former Police Chief Bradley Haas was killed last fall when a former patient returned to the facility and opened fire. While it is unclear how the person obtained the firearms, gun safety advocates say failure to report just one prohibited gun buyer to the NICS database puts everyone at risk.

Zandra Rice Hawkins, executive director of GunSenseNH, a project of Granite State Progress, said even former President Donald Trump signed a law to strengthen NICS reporting.

"This is a strong, bipartisan effort," Rice Hawkins emphasized. "It won't fix everything, but improving our NICS background check system is one, strong, easy way to make sure that the laws that are already on the books are enforced."

Rice Hawkins stressed there is no federal law requiring states to report prohibited buyers to the NICS system, making state record-reporting laws critical for public safety. She added the legislation also aims to protect those experiencing a mental health crisis. Nearly 90% of gun-related deaths in New Hampshire are suicides.