Senator: “Public Outcry” Forced a Better Election Finance Bill
Thursday, March 5, 2015
CHARLESTON, W.Va. – It's a public outcry that forced lawmakers to keep a state rule against corporations contributing to West Virginia political campaigns, according to one state senator.
As originally written, Senate Bill 541 would have removed many state limits on campaign contributions.
But Sen. Mike Woelfel (D-Huntington) stresses the bill was dramatically improved in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday. And he credits pressure from the public for saving the prohibition on corporate contributions.
"The public spoke clearly and loudly,” he points out. “I don't think any particular senators deserve credit.
“I think the people of our state deserve credit for speaking out in favor of restricting the injection of money into politics."
Woelfel adds he thinks the committee worked out a good compromise on the bill. He predicts it will have wide bipartisan support on the Senate floor, and says he expects to vote for it.
In the last election, millions of dollars of so-called dark money was spent in West Virginia's congressional and U.S. Senate races – donations made in secret that fund mud-slinging attack ads.
Woelfel says the bill as rewritten in committee now includes a lot of disclosure that should open those kinds of donations to public scrutiny – at least for state-level elections, if not congressional races. And he says the bill now includes other important provisions.
"Much more transparency than our old law, and some modest increases in contributions by individuals,” he states. “And we would be consistent with our current law, which would allow no corporations to contribute directly to candidates."
Woelfel and a number of other Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee opposed the bill when they first started work on it. He explains the original draft completely removed contribution limits they thought were vital – not only for individual and corporate donations, but even on foreign money.
"As the bill was introduced, contributions from foreign governments would not be prohibited, although there might be some federal legislation that would impair those,” he explains. “However, reasonable minds did prevail."
get more stories like this via email
Lawmakers in the Commonwealth are considering legislation to ensure police use of facial-recognition technology also protects people's privacy and civ…
Next week, Ohio farmers and their advocates head to Washington, D.C., to push for shifting federal programs toward growing nutritious food, as …
Social justice advocates have just launched a new public education campaign. It's called "Just Safe," and it's aimed at changing the conversation …
Reducing the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions is the goal of a bill before the New Mexico Legislature this session. Sen. Mimi Stewart, D-…
A Nevada nonprofit is celebrating a 94% graduation rate among its high school seniors for the 2021-2022 school year. Tami Hance-Lehr. CEO and state …
Super Bowl LVII is right around the corner, which means Arizona will see hefty spending and wide exposure because of the massive sporting event…
Health and Wellness
It is not a pandemic yet, but eye doctors worry the constant use of digital devices could eventually result in long-term health problems for many …
Maine's small farmers are encouraged to complete the latest U.S. Department of Agriculture census to ensure they have a voice in federal decisions …