ANNAPOLIS, Md. -- Since Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan refused to sign a measure to fund the state's new Prescription Drug Affordability board last week, health care reform groups now are urging the General Assembly to override the veto.

The first-in-the-nation board was established last year by lawmakers to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, an effort even more important now during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Vinny DeMarco, president of the Maryland Citizen's Health Initiative. He said he's disappointed by the veto of a bill that provides a loan that will be repaid through an assessment of drug companies.

"It is just completely baffling that Gov. Hogan would veto a bill which would pay back the state money and fund a really smart way to make prescription drugs more affordable," DeMarco said. "It seems he's taking the side of prescription-drug corporations against people who need their prescription drugs."

In a letter to General Assembly leaders, Hogan called the bill, and other revenue-raising bills he vetoed, "misguided," claiming they would raise taxes and fees on Marylanders, which would be "unconscionable" in the midst of a global pandemic and economic crash.

But DeMarco said Senate Bill 669 and House Bill 1095 would ultimately help folks save money. The bills would raise up to $2 million to fund the board through minimal fees from drug manufacturers and insurers of about $1,000 each, which he says they easily can afford.

He pointed out that the board will then use the money to hire researchers to investigate why drug prices have skyrocketed in an effort to bring them down.

"Twenty-five percent of Marylanders can't afford the prescription drugs they need. They have to choose between their drugs and their rent or their kids' college or so many other things," he said. "It makes no sense at a time when drug corporations spend a lot more on advertising than they do on research."

The Senate bill passed unanimously and the House bill was approved in a partisan vote - 98 Democrats to 36 Republicans. DeMarco is hopeful that when the General Assembly comes back into session, even if it's next January, an override will have full backing.


get more stories like this via email

A coalition of Montana groups will rally at the Capitol Wednesday to advocate for the protection of Medicaid expansion, which legislators will debate this session before the program's scheduled expiration in June.

The state's 10-year-old Medicaid expansion program covers 75,000 low-income Montanans at an annual cost of about $1 billion, according to KFF Health News. The state picks up about 10% of the tab.

Kristen Stewart of Billings is a caregiver for her 90-year-old grandmother, and enrolled in Medicaid herself. As an organizer with the advocacy group Big Sky 55+, she noted many Medicaid enrollees work but the work is often undervalued.

"Medicaid supports a lot of people who are doing unpaid work," Stewart pointed out. "Things that were we to monetize, you would see an economic boost from their production level, often more than the cost of their care."

The Gianforte administration already tightened eligibility for the program, cutting the number of enrollees by nearly 40% between May 2023 and October 2024. The program currently covers nondisabled adults ages 19 to 64 who make less than $21,000 a year.

Jeannie Brown, a bus driver for the Belgrade Public School District and a full-time caregiver and legal guardian for her teenage granddaughter, said if Medicaid expansion does not get reauthorized, she will be on a "slippery slope."

"Because I'm 60 years old and I'm having my own health issues after being a caregiver, it's hard work and it takes a toll on you physically, financially and emotionally," Brown explained. "I'm hoping these legislators really take all of these things into consideration and reauthorize it."

Any laws passed on the issue could also affect the state's behavioral health services, which Gov. Greg Gianforte has made a priority.

Obtaining medical records can be a costly endeavor but there is hope Washington state lawmakers could find a fix this session.

Medical providers look for compensation when producing medical records because of the work involved in the process.

Holly Brauchli, an attorney at Seattle Injury Law, said an outdated process is used to determine the cost. Federal law requires all records to be digitized and Brauchli pointed out providers charge per page as if the records were on paper.

"We download it and we get a bill for thousands of dollars and the justification of that bill is that there's a per page charge," Brauchli explained. "I get these invoices that say copying charge per page. There are no copies."

Brauchli noted there are a variety of reasons why someone would want to obtain their medical records. For instance, the records could be important to an injury lawsuit or someone might want to check if their health insurance was billing them correctly.

Brauchli argued records should no longer be charged as if they are on paper.

"This seems like a really easy fix and certainly one that would help Washington citizens," Brauchli contended. "People have a right to know what's in their medical record and they have a right to be able to see it. So, to me, it's a really simple and elegant fix."

A bill has not been filed yet but is expected from Sen. Tina Orwall, D-Des Moines, soon. The 2025 legislative session starts today.

This Wednesday is the deadline to enroll in Affordable Care Act marketplace health coverage.

Advocates say this year is even more critical for those seeking a plan, because the expanded tax credits that allowed many Kentuckians to enroll in health coverage - at little or no monthly cost - are set to expire at the end of this year.

After Jan. 15, folks will have to qualify for a special enrollment period to take advantage of Advanced Premium Tax Credits while they still exist.

Priscilla Easterling, director of outreach and enrollment with Kentucky Voices for Health, said the state's uninsured rate could potentially increase if families can't afford coverage without the credits.

"I think we should all be very concerned," said Easterling. "Without these enhanced premium tax credits being extended, we're going to see enrollment drop off, because families will no longer be able to afford that monthly premium."

According to research from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the elimination of expanded tax credits would especially impact older adults - who tend to have higher health coverage costs.

In 2024, people over age 50 made up more than one-third of total ACA enrollment.

Easterling said in many cases, for low-income individuals making around $22,000 per year, the credits covered the full cost of their plan, and have saved Kentuckians thousands of dollars a year.

"They have been around for the duration of the ACA," said Easterling, "but the enhanced part that was first expanded in 2021. They have, on average, saved most households over $500 per month."

Easterling said residents can find local experts at kynect.gov to help them take advantage of tax credits and find the best plan for them.

"There are 'kynectors' available in all 120 counties," said Easterling, "who can help and provide free assistance for anyone who needs help navigating Kynect.gov or trying to get enrolled in coverage."

During 2024, more than 71,000 Kentucky residents enrolled in a plan through the marketplace, according to the health advocacy group KFF.

Nationwide, a record 24 million people have signed up for insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act, according to federal data.