In what the American Library Association has called an unprecedented year of censorship, libraries in Missouri are fighting a rule proposed by the secretary of state that would require people younger than 18 to have a parent's permission to check out books from public and school libraries.

Librarians say this amounts to government overreach and censorship.

The rule was proposed by Missouri's Republican Secretary of State John Ashcroft, who is widely thought to be running for governor in 2024.

It would require a parent to sign off on a book before their kid could check it out of the library, especially if the book appeals to what the proposed rule calls the "prurient interests" of the minor.

Bob Priddy is a library board member in Jefferson City. He said this is the camel's nose under the tent flap.

"The next thing you know, we're going to have people as government saying there are certain books that nobody should read," said Priddy. "I can see where this is the kind of thing where government wants to, in one way or another, withhold information from people who have a right to have that information."

Ashcroft has also called on libraries to craft written policies deciding what books are appropriate for which age group, and would then allow parents to challenge those decisions.

How each library would be expected to create those lists and how parents could challenge them is not spelled out in the proposed rule and, critics say, has intentionally been left vague.

Joe Kohlburn chairs the intellectual freedom committee for the Missouri Library Association. He said if it's approved, the measure would make less information available to people who need it.

"I mean like this is is why we pay tax dollars for libraries to have access to information," said Kohlburn, "and if that information is controlled for political means, then we are sort of undermining the purpose of libraries in general."

Under Missouri law, the secretary of state's office controls its library system.

Ashcroft has said he is not anti-library and that he has no interest in banning books, but wants to let parents decide what their kids read.

The law requires a 30-day public comment period before the proposed rule can be finalized. That period is up Thursday.

The potential dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education has sparked concern in Ohio.

Threatened moves by the Trump administration's so-called Department of Government Efficiency have Buckeye educators and union leaders worried about the effects on students and schools across the state.

Scott DiMauro, president of the Ohio Education Association, said Ohio schools receive approximately 10% of their funding from federal sources, with some high-poverty districts relying on as much as 25%.

"What we see happening now is the administration taking a sledgehammer, eliminating staff, cutting programs, canceling contracts," DiMauro observed. "And all of that, while it seems like DC stuff, it's things that have a real impact on our students and educators here in the state of Ohio."

DiMauro added programs like Title I, which support over 800,000 low-income students and federal oversight of special education would be significantly affected. The Department of Education released a statement saying it would cut nearly 50% of the department's workforce.

The Department of Government Efficiency, guided by billionaire Elon Musk, aims to reduce government waste and cut funding to schools promoting "critical race theory" and "transgender ideologies".

The possible dissolution of the Education Department also raises concerns among federal employees within the Department of Education.

Sheria D. Smith, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252, the union that represents Department of Education employees, said it is a relatively tiny federal agency of just 4,000 employees. She noted five years ago under the last Trump Administration, department staff were asked to fulfill Diversity, Equity and Inclusion training and now they are being told they are being laid off for upholding DEI.

Smith explained members hold roles such as civil rights attorneys, loan processors, statisticians, IT professionals and press specialists.

"What we are not, though many of us are former teachers, we are not teachers," Smith pointed out. "We do not dictate curriculum, talk about fraud, race, and waste, and abuse. How many people who are making double our salary don't seem to even understand what we do at the U.S. Department of Education."

While some Ohioans see the move as an opportunity for greater state control over education, others warned it could lead to funding gaps and increased burdens on local taxpayers.

Legislation to overhaul the way Oregon funds early childhood special education has advanced through the state House with near unanimous support, moving to the Senate Education Committee.

House Bill 2682 would create an advisory committee to recommend service updates, incorporating the latest research and family experiences.

Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, is sponsoring the bill. She said the current funding model no longer reflects the reality of what it takes to support young children with disabilities and the bill would set the state up for success.

"This prepares us to know exactly what needs to change in our early intervention, early childhood special education to make sure that we are taking appropriate legislative next steps," Neron explained.

Neron highlighted the need to update the timing of special education funding, which is currently allocated in the spring. She noted programs often grow by 40% during the school year, leaving staff overwhelmed with caseloads in the second half.

Stacy Rager, executive director of early learning for the Northwest Regional Education Service District, said Oregon needs a new funding model to ensure children receive more instructional time, closer to the 30 hours of preschool per week offered by other states. She noted students in Oregon sometimes get as few as 4 hours of special education services per week.

"I have had many tearful conversations with families where they move in from a different part of the country," Rager recounted. "I have to deliver the sad news that we just are not funded at that level."

Rager hopes to stabilize special education funding, which has been experiencing large swings over the years, to prevent staff cuts directly affecting families. Her team includes special education teachers, occupational therapists, and speech pathologists.

"Finding people that want to do this work that have a heart for this work, and then to have to hire and lay off hire and lay off," Rager observed. "It's just so hard on the staff and on the families."

She added with adequate funding, her program can extend its services inside preschools, offering additional adult support and training for preschool staff.


get more stories like this via email

Cuts to the U.S. education system are expected to create a profound ripple effect on students and staff in Hamtramck's already struggling school district.

Hamtramck serves more than 2,900 students, including 300 in special-education programs.

Last week, the U.S. Department of Education laid off nearly half of its employees - with approximately 89 contracts, totaling close to $900 million.

Toni Coral is a teacher and president of the Hamtramck Federation of Teachers. She highlighted how these cuts will hit her district especially hard.

"Hamtramck is a district with a lot of what we call Title 1 students," said Coral, "at-risk students, and poorer families. If Title 1 went away, or if it was substantially reduced, we would lose teachers and our students would lose a lot of services."

Staff members from the U.S. Department of Education will be placed on administrative leave starting this Friday. The federal government seeks to slash spending by as much as $2 trillion.

Title I funding was created in 1965 and helps schools with many low-income students that need financial support.

Coral discussed some of the special services that would be affected by the cuts. She noted that Title I funding is essential for providing the support certain students need to thrive.

"With Title 1 money, we're able to hire certified staff to work in smaller groups to target their reading, their literacy, to work on math skills," said Coral, "and language skills for our students in Hamtramck who are brand new to the country, or relatively new to the country and just learning English. It would be devastating."

There are plans to get rid of 17 federal education programs and slash almost $5 billion from Title I funding.

This could lead to 72,000 teachers losing their jobs in schools that serve low-income students across the country.