Residents in West Virginia want more input on a four-lane highway slated to cut through the towns of Thomas and Davis, continuing over the Blackwater Canyon Historic Area, after local officials passed a resolution voicing their support for the project.
The state received federal Infrastructure Bill funding to complete the Corridor H Highway, which begins in Tucker County.
Hugh Rogers - chair of the highways committee and board member for the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy - said residents and business owners, who rely on tourism, are concerned about the effect of the highway on wildlife and outdoor recreation.
"They didn't like the noise impacts," said Rogers, "the lights, the impacts to the upper Blackwater Canyon area, the historic site that's there, all the trails. "
More than five thousand residents have signed a petition calling for a better route.
The state argues the project will open up remote areas in Grant, Tucker and Hardy counties to economic development - and boost travel between West Virginia, Virginia and Washington, D.C.
Rogers noted that the Corridor H project is mostly funded with federal money, and so requires an Environmental Impact Statement.
He said that process offers an opportunity for communities to re-examine how a four-lane highway will impact endangered species.
"They have to comply with federal law," said Rogers. "The rules say that if you don't build something within three years of your EIS, then you have to look again because conditions might have changed."
According to federal data, more than two million visitors to national parks in West Virginia spent $108 million in the state in 2021.
Disclosure: West Virginia Highlands Conservancy contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy & Priorities, Environment, Urban Planning/Transportation, Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Indigenous water protectors and allies met at Michigan's Straits of Mackinac last week, to spotlight the dangers of the 71-year-old Line 5, deemed North America's riskiest crude oil pipeline.
Headlined by the nonprofit Oil and Water Don't Mix, the protests featured two main events: The "Pipe Out Paddle Up" in St. Ignace which showcased a flotilla against Enbridge's Line Five oil spill risk, followed by the "Water is Life Festival" in Petoskey, celebrating local music and advocacy for ending Line Five's threat.
Nichole Keway Biber, Michigan organizer for Clean Water Action, a member of the Oil and Water Don't Mix coalition, explained Indigenous people have been given stewardship over the waters.
"Also really critical to us having lived relationship to our culture and what our teachings are and our instructions are," Keway Biber explained. "So much of that is to protect and oversee the water and the wildlife."
Keway Biber emphasized the events focused on the preservation of the Indigenous way of life. Enbridge has maintained Line Five's safety is exclusively regulated by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Keway Biber noted there are many individuals, both from Michigan and beyond, who treasure and deeply value the Great Lakes but remain unaware of the significant threats posed by Line Five.
"They may not know we're constantly just a moment away from this catastrophic kind of ruination of those precious fresh waters," Keway Biber stressed. "It's powerful for them to first and foremost here about it from people who are committed to protecting the water and the people and the wildlife."
Enbridge moves up to 540,000 barrels of light crude oil, light synthetic crude oil and liquefied natural gas through Line Five.
Disclosure: Oil and Water Don't Mix contributes to our fund for reporting on Climate Change/Air Quality, Environment, Environmental Justice, and Water. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
The Biden Administration issued an executive order in 2022 to strengthen and protect America's forests and old-growth trees.
Old-growth trees have grown and survived beyond the traditional age of harvest.
The Sierra Club and other environmental groups are pushing for more clarity from federal agencies on their strategy for protecting old-growth forests.
Illinois Environmental Council Conservation Director Lindsey Keeney said those agencies manage forests with various goals in mind.
"We trust our evidence-based science partners to decide what sort of management practices make sense within each of these forested areas," said Keeney. "Whether that is removing diseased trees through logging, using prescribed fire as an invasive species treatment, or other conservation practices, to manage those forests."
The council acknowledges that forest stewardship practices are so fragmented that invasive species encroach on the trees.
The agency says the best way to help preserve old-growth trees is through logging and other forms of restoration to keep these threats in check.
A new Sierra Club report says research confirms mature trees reduce carbon emissions - but also remain at risk for wildfires, disease, climate change, and invasive species.
Keeney said forested sands in Illinois do a great job capturing and holding carbon.
Many local economies thrive, she acknowledged, because of forest management activities - including in the sustainable forest product sector.
"We are the Prairie State, but we are definitely a forested state too," said Keeney. "Even up in Chicago, the Forest Preserve systems have really healthy forests. Downstate all the way through Central Illinois, we have forests that are protected by our land trust organizations. And then we have the Shawnee National Forest down at the bottom third of our state."
A U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service analysis reports Illinois has nearly 4,900,000 acres of forestland.
It says wildfires disturb 3,700 acres of forestland in Illinois every year. And weather impacts nearly 8,500 acres of forestland in the state.
get more stories like this via email
Climate and environmental activists along the Texas Coast are celebrating after receiving favorable news from an insurance company covering liquefied natural gas terminals.
Melanie Oldham, director of the group Better Brazoria Clean Air and Water, said after a meeting with members of their front line community, Chubb Insurance denied coverage for the expansion of one project and they are hopeful the same will be true for a planned plant expansion in Freeport.
"They said keep track of all the operational problems of Freeport LNG and we will keep looking at them," Oldham explained. "And we're hoping Chubb takes the lead and stops insuring these LNG's."
The plant in Freeport is the second-largest in the United States. It was shut down for several months in 2022 following an explosion, which federal investigators said was caused by inadequate operating and testing procedures, human error and fatigue.
Oldham lives about four miles from the Freeport plant and multiple petrochemical companies. Two oil export projects are also proposed for the area. She pointed out the community of around 13,000 people suffers from many illnesses due to the hazardous chemicals released from the plants.
"We have 65% Hispanic, Black, White, Asian; very low-income community," Oldham noted. "I'm a health care professional, I helped Texas Department of State Health do a cancer cluster study here in 2018. We have eight types of cancers higher than to be expected. COPD, it just goes on and on."
Oldham and others said further permitting of oil and gas infrastructure on the Gulf Coast would quadruple gas exports and likely cause hurricanes to hit the region even harder and they are calling on the Biden administration to permanently ban such facilities.
get more stories like this via email