Health experts say extending Ohio's 12-month continuous health coverage for kids relying on Medicaid or CHIP until a child turns six would be a big help to Ohio's youngest residents.
The state will begin rechecking eligibility for these programs after a pandemic-era law ends on April 1.
Kelly Vyzral, senior health policy associate for Children's Defense Fund Ohio, explained that once children are eligible for Medicaid, their parents wouldn't have to worry about re-enrolling them until they start elementary school. That means kids would be more likely to get their regular doctor visits, health screenings and developmental checks.
"They might have that eyesight, they might have issues with their mobility, they could have dyslexia, any type of issues like that," she said, "that you can catch early and begin to remediate, begin to work on - that just puts that child so much further ahead."
According to new research from the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families, an estimated three in four children will likely lose coverage when the pandemic's emergency coverage protections end this spring, even though they will still be eligible for Medicaid or CHIP.
Vryzal said there are numerous resources Ohio families can use to check their eligibility.
"There are lots of community organizations that they can reach out to if they need help," she said. "I would suggest that people reach out to their food banks, that they reach out to their county caseworkers, and make sure that they have that information updated."
Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy, said federal research indicates 72% of the kids who lose their Medicaid coverage will still be eligible, noting Black and Latino families are at greater risk of losing theirs.
"Language issues may be a barrier when you have families who are perhaps mixed-status immigrant families, who have some fear about engaging with the government; families who live in rural areas, who don't have good internet connectivity," she said. "There are lots of reasons families are going to be at greater risk."
Nearly 70% of Black children and 60% of Latino children nationwide are now receiving public coverage, according to data from the National Health Interview Survey.
Disclosure: Georgetown University Center for Children & Families contributes to our fund for reporting on Children's Issues, Health Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
A persistent child care worker shortage across New Hampshire is leaving families with few options.
The state is currently short more than 7,000 child care positions but low wages and burnout are driving workers from the field and forcing some centers to close.
Shannon Tremblay, director of the New Hampshire Child Care Advisory Council, said workers are struggling to care for their own families with wages barely above the federal poverty line.
"No one wants to come in for a low wage," Tremblay pointed out. "No one wants to come in making $15 an hour, working long hours in a stressful environment."
Tremblay argued greater state investment will create long-term benefits for both parents and children, some of whom may have disabilities or behavioral issues which could be identified earlier by trained child care staff.
Last year, state lawmakers invested more than $60 million in child care services, including $15 million for the creation of child care workforce grants and investments in the state's Family Resource Centers.
Tremblay emphasized the end of career and technical education programs in New Hampshire high schools broke the pipeline of workers entering the field, putting greater pressure on current staff to do it all.
"Our providers are the case manager, the cook, the plumber," Tremblay observed. "They want to provide that high-quality care and right now it's just, they can't do it."
Tremblay stressed pandemic-era funding to support the child care industry will run out in September, so state lawmakers need to act. She added the state could increase wages so the burden does not fall on New Hampshire families, who currently spend roughly $24,000 a year on care for two children under age five.
get more stories like this via email
The child welfare system in Pennsylvania faces a staffing crisis affecting children and families throughout the system.
The Child Welfare Resource Center said about 30 counties report caseworker vacancy rates of 30% or higher
Terry Clark, president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Council of Children, Youth and Family Services, at a state Senate hearing on child welfare, challenged the Departments of Education and Human Services to work together to develop a STEM-focused model for human services. It could offer young people opportunities for training, apprenticeships and careers in child welfare, juvenile justice and behavioral health.
"We spend a lot of time focusing on colleges and universities," Clark noted. "But we believe we might want to back this up a little bit, and start looking at middle schools and high schools. Try to reinvigorate, get younger students motivated and trying to come into this field."
Clark pointed out some agencies have asked supervisors and even people from other departments to take on casework responsibilities. A recent Philadelphia study found Community Umbrella Agencies had an average 45% turnover rate, with vacancies ranging from 21-60 positions.
Clark observed private providers face workforce challenges similar to the county child welfare agencies. He emphasized counties are beginning to explore more contractual relationships with private providers for needed work.
"Counties are starting to put out RFPs, calls for private providers to help supplement their workforce," Clark stressed. "That means they're asking private providers to take on roles and functions that, in the past, were primarily done by counties themselves."
Clark argued competitive wages are seen as crucial to attract and retain child welfare workers, and county funding often falls short. He added student loan forgiveness and fellowship programs may be promising ways to bring new people into the field, but lawmakers would have to agree.
"There have been House bills and different Senate bills that have been introduced, or at least in draft form over the years," Clark acknowledged. "We hope that there's continued discussion about those, because if we can get some movement on those, we think those will really help."
He told legislators the turnover trends will not change significantly without increased investment in workers.
Disclosure: The Pennsylvania Council of Children, Youth and Family Services contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Children's Issues, Education, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Despite a recent policy victory, Wisconsin labor leaders still express concern about the current environment for shielding young teens from unsafe work environments.
Gov. Tony Evers this month vetoed a bill which would have expanded the elimination of required work permits for those younger than 18. The bill's language applied to 14- and 15-year-olds, several years after the state did away with parental permission for 16- and 17-year-olds.
Stephanie Bloomingdale, president of the Wisconsin State AFL-CIO, said the recent debates are policy fights advocates thought they won decades ago when minors often worked in dangerous conditions. She cautioned there is a strong push to chip away at protections.
"We are seeing a growing movement from different, unscrupulous employers that want to put kids back in the workplace, and not have the kind of oversight that is needed," Bloomingdale contended.
The Economic Policy Institute said rollbacks have been approved in a dozen states in the past few years. While current efforts are thwarted in Wisconsin, Bloomingdale worries about similar debates in future sessions.
Meanwhile, violations are trending upward, with the U.S. Labor Department reporting an 83% increase in financial penalties. Backers of the Wisconsin bill said the goal was to reduce red tape for families.
Bloomingdale countered taking away another layer of protection does more to trample on the rights of parents and guardians. And with higher consumer prices placing more pressure on household budgets, she added some kids might feel the need to bring in additional income.
She emphasized the current law helps the whole family make an informed decision.
"It's important for kids to get a good work ethic," Bloomingdale acknowledged. "But at the same time, these kids need to make sure that they are getting enough sleep, that they are able to participate in their school, and really making sure that balance is there."
The Economic Policy Institute report showed amid the push in many states to weaken laws, several other states have advanced bills to strengthen protections. There have been bipartisan bills in Congress which, among other things, would crack down on violators.
get more stories like this via email